Skip to main content

1.26 Cultural Studies Paradigms & Legacies

In both "Cultural Studies: Two Paradigms" and "Cultural Studies and its Theoretical Legacies," Hall explicates one of cultural studies' primary aims — to grasp the relationship between culture and society — by holding several contradictory theoretical and political perspectives in tension: structuralism/culturalism, base/superstructure, ideology/culture, conditions/consciousness. Hall calls for "living with this tension," in the latter piece. From my reading, it seems part of why cultural studies must live with this tension is because of what Hall calls "the displacement of culture." What exactly does Hall mean by the displacement of culture — that we must work through textualities, but that "textualities are never enough"? And what does this insight allow us to do? 

Hall ends "Theoretical Legacies" with a passage on contemporary (1990s?) American cultural studies — the "crude work" of merely connecting power to culture, "emptied of any signification." These paragraphs made me think of the importance of theoretical struggle (for instance, his own against Althusser's thought). Earlier, Hall outlines the privileged objects of study for cultural studies: "culture, ideology, language, the symbolic," and narrates how these objects came to that position out of an engagement with/challenge to Eurocentric marxism. Do these objects of study (culture, ideology, language, the symbolic) remain at the center of today's cultural studies? If so, how have the questions we ask around them changed, if at all? Additionally, If the "only theory worth having is the one you have to fight off," the one whose engagement produces necessary problems which demand to be addressed, what are the theoretical paradigms against which cultural studies are presently struggling?


*I use "cultural studies" here in a way that assumes it is a coherent, singular project, a notion that is productively troubled by many of our readings (especially Giroux), but I still use it for the sake of ease (to say nothing of the question of whether cultural studies as a project even exists absent a presence outside of the university institution, or absent a political dimension or "edge.")


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2/2 Discussion Questions

Althusser makes a point that ISAs operate as "unified" under the ruling ideology. To what extent are certain ISAs unified if they are "the site of class struggle" playing out, holding the potential for "ruptures" (to use Hall's phrase) with dominant ideologies? Here, I am thinking about the University of Iowa's COVID policies and how its rules are practiced and applied in many different ways throughout campus, as administrative burdens and scale make it difficult to oversee large numbers of employees. More generally, as junior scholars, grad students, and/or individuals doing cultural studies work, does it make more sense for us to do deep and nuanced readings of theorists such as Marx and Althusser in our work, or to cite others who have expanded these traditions over the years?
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?
Post a Comment
Read more