Skip to main content

2/2 Discussion Reflection

 1) I have been mulling over Hall's re-reading of Marx in "The Problem of Ideology." Specifically, I'm wondering how useful the circuit model can be for understanding other systems outside of the economic one Hall and Marx write about? I'm thinking here about the use of circuit models in media studies (especially Julie D'Acci's, for my fellow Comm-rades out there...) Hall writes that, "if, in our explanation, we privilege one moment only, and do not take account of the differentiated whole or ‘ensemble’ of which it is a part; or if we use categories of thought, appropriate to one such moment alone, to explain the whole process; then we are in danger of giving what Marx would have called (after Hegel) a ‘one-sided’ account" (36). This seems to not only displace some of the critiques Hall is writing against, but when thinking about this from a media studies perspective, helps us get away from privileging only one perspective of studying media for understanding it as a process or circuit. Especially when thinking about the text-based research that often elides scrutiny of the industrial practices that produced it or the reception practices of audiences, this seems like an extremely fruitful argument for studying media as a circuit rather than focusing on one specific dimension. 

2) From Althusser, I think I have similar concerns as Hall in terms of the ideology and the deterministic functionality of ISAs. It seems that Althusser sees us as "always-already" functioning within ideology, there is no way out: "what thus seems to take place outside ideology (to be precise, in the street), in reality takes place in ideology" (163). Is everything always taking place within ideology? If this is true, it seems that there would be no room for subversion or resisting practices which obviously take place in society, which (I think) is Hall's point about Althusser's argument being too "functionalist." However, I am also hesitant to write this off as too deterministic, because I think there is a point there: we all follow certain ideologies for the most part, but I don't see these ideologies as always disciplining how we act in society. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Articulation_by_Abby Escatel

 In "Race, Articulation and Societies Structured in Dominance," Stuart Hall is concerned with complicating Marxist theory's tendency to overgeneralize and universalize its claims that are specifically located within a European history of labor. Questions concerning slavery, coloniality, unfree/forced labor come to the fore and force Marxist theorists to grapple with the need to be specific in their contextualization and historicization of particular moments, ruptures and conjunctures. My questions are as follows:  1. How do we move forward with Marxism while taking into account the component of "unfreedom" when conceptualizing class, labor, and labor power? How does the "proletariat" fail to account for the lived realities of racialized bodies?  2. It seems as though Hall is also saying that race is not all encompassing and also shouldn't be overgeneralized/universalized. In short, labor and race are both always already at work. As a scholar who ce...
Post a Comment
Read more

Pedagogy vs. the indulgence of regressive politics (a. darryl moton)

I deeply hate to focus on merely one aspect of the incredibly rich texts we read for this week, but I stopped clearly on this paragraph from the Giroux: These are hard times for educators and advocates of democratic schooling. Beseiged by the growing forces of vocationalism and the neoconservative cultural warriors, prospective and existing classroom teachers are caught in an ideological crossfire regarding the civic and political responsibilities they assume as engaged critics and cultural theorists. Asked to define themselves either through the language of the marketplace or through a discourse of liberal objectivity and neutrality that abstracts the political from the realm of the cultural and sopcial, educators are increasingly being pressured to become either servants of corporate power or disengaged specialists wedded to the imperatives of a resurgent and debasing academic professionalism.(343) Having taught in high schools in the early-to-mid-2000s, I witnessed firsthand both...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?
Post a Comment
Read more