Skip to main content

2/2 Discussion Reflection

 1) I have been mulling over Hall's re-reading of Marx in "The Problem of Ideology." Specifically, I'm wondering how useful the circuit model can be for understanding other systems outside of the economic one Hall and Marx write about? I'm thinking here about the use of circuit models in media studies (especially Julie D'Acci's, for my fellow Comm-rades out there...) Hall writes that, "if, in our explanation, we privilege one moment only, and do not take account of the differentiated whole or ‘ensemble’ of which it is a part; or if we use categories of thought, appropriate to one such moment alone, to explain the whole process; then we are in danger of giving what Marx would have called (after Hegel) a ‘one-sided’ account" (36). This seems to not only displace some of the critiques Hall is writing against, but when thinking about this from a media studies perspective, helps us get away from privileging only one perspective of studying media for understanding it as a process or circuit. Especially when thinking about the text-based research that often elides scrutiny of the industrial practices that produced it or the reception practices of audiences, this seems like an extremely fruitful argument for studying media as a circuit rather than focusing on one specific dimension. 

2) From Althusser, I think I have similar concerns as Hall in terms of the ideology and the deterministic functionality of ISAs. It seems that Althusser sees us as "always-already" functioning within ideology, there is no way out: "what thus seems to take place outside ideology (to be precise, in the street), in reality takes place in ideology" (163). Is everything always taking place within ideology? If this is true, it seems that there would be no room for subversion or resisting practices which obviously take place in society, which (I think) is Hall's point about Althusser's argument being too "functionalist." However, I am also hesitant to write this off as too deterministic, because I think there is a point there: we all follow certain ideologies for the most part, but I don't see these ideologies as always disciplining how we act in society. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Journals and Prose

My two questions from this week have emerged from the Judith Butler piece, A 'Bad Writer' Bites Back , both centered around the journal, Philosophy and Literature —which Butler describes as the self-proclaimed “arbiter of good prose.”  I agree with Butler’s staunch defense of questioning common sense and provoking “new ways of looking at a familiar world”, and was reminded of David Harvey’s quote in the introduction to his Companion to Marx’s Capital : “Real learning always entails a struggle to understand the unknown.”   Butler describes Philosophy and Literature as a “culturally conservative academic journal” which naturally led me down a longer-than-anticipated visit to the journal's website . I was greeted with a video presented by the Philosophy and Literature’s editor Garry L. Hagberg, who rails against the “jargon infested” work that litters the journal’s field, locating Philosophy and Literature in clear opposition to such bothersome clutter.  However, Hagberg...
Post a Comment
Read more

Articulation_by_Abby Escatel

 In "Race, Articulation and Societies Structured in Dominance," Stuart Hall is concerned with complicating Marxist theory's tendency to overgeneralize and universalize its claims that are specifically located within a European history of labor. Questions concerning slavery, coloniality, unfree/forced labor come to the fore and force Marxist theorists to grapple with the need to be specific in their contextualization and historicization of particular moments, ruptures and conjunctures. My questions are as follows:  1. How do we move forward with Marxism while taking into account the component of "unfreedom" when conceptualizing class, labor, and labor power? How does the "proletariat" fail to account for the lived realities of racialized bodies?  2. It seems as though Hall is also saying that race is not all encompassing and also shouldn't be overgeneralized/universalized. In short, labor and race are both always already at work. As a scholar who ce...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 5

  What are the differences between Gramsci’s concept of the “organic intellectual” and Hall’s “public pedagogy?”   On the topic of the diasporic intellectual, Kuan-Hsing Chen mentions that “Some of the diasporic intellectuals I know of have exercised their power, for better or worse, back home, but you have not. And some of them are trying to move back, in whatever way. So, in that sense, you are very peculiar” (503). Although Hall felt some reconnection with the Carribean through the Black diasporic population in Britain, he insists that cultural identity is not fixed but “comes out of very specific historical formations, out of very specific histories and cultural repertoires of enunciation, that it can constitute a ‘positionality’, which we call, provisionally, identity” (503). Individuals can negotiate, rearticulate, recontextualize their different identities, but how does this rearticulation work at an institutional-level?   Thelma
Post a Comment
Read more