Skip to main content

Corrine's Op Ed

     Although the Grammy’s “rebranded” their “urban” music award in 2020 after being taken to task by Tyler, the Creator for using the term to cover all black artists, regardless of their chosen genre, its lingering presence can still be felt in the new “Progressive R&B” award that has taken its place. Where Tyler, the Creator and other artists argued for more diverse genres that allow for broader categorizations for “people who look like [him],” the Grammy’s simply tucked one category into the other, reflecting how “urban” and R&B are both intrinsically linked and coded to the Grammy’s board as “black music.” This neat folding away of urban back into R&B seems to be unhelpful at best and reductive at worst, and has serious repercussions for us all, artist or otherwise: the pigeonholing of black art/ists into essentialized categories allows for only a few forms of blackness to be legitimated through the Grammy system, but it also reflects the rigid boundaries that constitute any category in our society, racial or otherwise. Looking at the past decade of winners in the chart provided, are we really to believe not a single black person made contributions to Grammy-winning rock or pop music yet won in Urban/R&B every single year? 

A reconceptualization of award categories for music genres at the Grammy’s is obviously in order. Sociologist Stuart Hall conceptualizes “new ethnicities” by arguing that there is no one single black subject or experience that is constructed by nature or any other essential force, and because of this, “it must be the case that they are constructed historically, culturally, politically.” This is ethnicity: a non-coercive, diverse understanding that “we all speak from a particular place, out of a particular history, out of a particular experience, a particular culture.” Understanding “new genres,” if you will, easily follows: there is no one “black music,” and all artists, black or otherwise, are operating from a particular place, history, and experience that does not necessarily bound them to any one genre. While R&B and rap have their roots in black culture, they are not the only genres in which black artists operate. One only needs to look at bands like Living Colour or Meet Me @ the Altar to find black artists rocking outside of these genres and blurring categories across them. 

Of course, a music award show needs categories, and I am certainly not arguing for a complete explosion of the award show system. I am, however, arguing that we need to expand our understanding of music genres and who goes where; we must take where an artist is speaking from on each individual album rather than speak for them to contain them into categories that essentialize their work based on their race or ethnicity. Although artists are free to submit their album to multiple genres, the final say lays in the hands of the Grammy’s voting committees and members. My call is for these voters to expand their understanding of what constitutes these genres and who is representative of them. While we’ve broken down the monolith that is urban music, at least in labeling genres, we must now reconceptualize what these genres represent and who represents them. Music genres, much like ethnicity, are not stable, static categories: they are always influenced by other genres and people as they move through time.

Furthermore, opening these categories pushes dominant genres like pop and rock to expand their boundaries and include more artists who see themselves as working within these genres. If we continue to have rigid definitions of what counts as pop/rock and what falls outside of it, we only continue to highlight the same voices and people repeatedly, and those who fail to meet the qualifying boxes are continuously left out or relegated to “other” categories which receive significantly less fanfare. While this is arguably a non-issue for people outside of media industries, this is reflective of larger issues in our society: if you do not fit into the categories already laid out for you or want to blur boundaries, there is little to no room for movement. Even if you are the best at what you do, if you are not easily categorizable or push back against the category you are placed in, you are left with no rewards while those who play the game reap them in. If we allow artists to speak for themselves in terms of genre rather than place them in static categories based on assumptions, we all may just find that the categories we are bound by in our lives loosen up. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On Journals and Prose

My two questions from this week have emerged from the Judith Butler piece, A 'Bad Writer' Bites Back , both centered around the journal, Philosophy and Literature —which Butler describes as the self-proclaimed “arbiter of good prose.”  I agree with Butler’s staunch defense of questioning common sense and provoking “new ways of looking at a familiar world”, and was reminded of David Harvey’s quote in the introduction to his Companion to Marx’s Capital : “Real learning always entails a struggle to understand the unknown.”   Butler describes Philosophy and Literature as a “culturally conservative academic journal” which naturally led me down a longer-than-anticipated visit to the journal's website . I was greeted with a video presented by the Philosophy and Literature’s editor Garry L. Hagberg, who rails against the “jargon infested” work that litters the journal’s field, locating Philosophy and Literature in clear opposition to such bothersome clutter.  However, Hagberg...

Articulation_by_Abby Escatel

 In "Race, Articulation and Societies Structured in Dominance," Stuart Hall is concerned with complicating Marxist theory's tendency to overgeneralize and universalize its claims that are specifically located within a European history of labor. Questions concerning slavery, coloniality, unfree/forced labor come to the fore and force Marxist theorists to grapple with the need to be specific in their contextualization and historicization of particular moments, ruptures and conjunctures. My questions are as follows:  1. How do we move forward with Marxism while taking into account the component of "unfreedom" when conceptualizing class, labor, and labor power? How does the "proletariat" fail to account for the lived realities of racialized bodies?  2. It seems as though Hall is also saying that race is not all encompassing and also shouldn't be overgeneralized/universalized. In short, labor and race are both always already at work. As a scholar who ce...

Week 5

  What are the differences between Gramsci’s concept of the “organic intellectual” and Hall’s “public pedagogy?”   On the topic of the diasporic intellectual, Kuan-Hsing Chen mentions that “Some of the diasporic intellectuals I know of have exercised their power, for better or worse, back home, but you have not. And some of them are trying to move back, in whatever way. So, in that sense, you are very peculiar” (503). Although Hall felt some reconnection with the Carribean through the Black diasporic population in Britain, he insists that cultural identity is not fixed but “comes out of very specific historical formations, out of very specific histories and cultural repertoires of enunciation, that it can constitute a ‘positionality’, which we call, provisionally, identity” (503). Individuals can negotiate, rearticulate, recontextualize their different identities, but how does this rearticulation work at an institutional-level?   Thelma