Skip to main content

"Face the facts...existence hurts existence in the famine asylum"

My favorite quote from this week is from "The Great Moving Nowhere Show:"
"In Fact, it's impossible to know how radical and innovative a concrete proposal is until you know which strategy it is attempting to put in place and the criteria against which its 'radicalism' is being assesed."
Like a few of the posts I've read so far for this week, I see obvious parallels between Hall's assessment of post-Thatcher, Blairite, "Third Way" neoliberalism and the current state of affairs here on the other side of the pond. I think it's interesting that (at least ca. 1998) Hall was so confronted by existing social problems that he considered it necessary to "broker a new relationship between markets and the public good." I suppose that's the voice of a pragmatist who had been watching the British Left struggle for over fifty years at that point. That said, even in 1998, I was beginning to see the cracks in the neoliberal agenda, both in theory (what truly was the moral/ethical base of those that fashioned themselves "liberals" when their champions were a serial sexual harasser in Clinton and a Religious Right stealth plant in Al Gore) and in practice (the "third way democrat" need to appeal to corporate greed, made manifest through truly evil people like Joe Lieberman and Joe Biden, paving the way for the Patriot Act's surveillance state, the Affordable Care Act's windfall of public money to private insurers, and the Democratic National Committee's manipulation of media contacts to make sure billions of free media attention was given to someone too stupid to be a fascist with any sense of nuance). My first question for the week: Are we part of a Fukuyama-esque linear endpoint to society and culture? Are the 'great moves' analyzed by Hall--Right, Nowhere--inevitable, as every effort to push the Global North to the left, politely or otherwise, is met with resistance at every turn? I continue to be amused by Hall's method of delivery--he's a master of conveying sarcasm and cynicism without the benefit of tone-of-voice or facial expression. His caustic (borrowed) description of the 1955 British General Election in "The new Conservatism and the Old" gets me, because it seems to sum up every ostensible "democracy" in the Global North since at the very least WWII: "the result would depend on how many working-class [voters], looking into their mirrors, saw middle-class faces." I guess my second question ties to the first: Is any revolution that occurs within the paradigmatic framework of a capitalist society doomed to forever be 'limited'?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2/2 Discussion Questions

Althusser makes a point that ISAs operate as "unified" under the ruling ideology. To what extent are certain ISAs unified if they are "the site of class struggle" playing out, holding the potential for "ruptures" (to use Hall's phrase) with dominant ideologies? Here, I am thinking about the University of Iowa's COVID policies and how its rules are practiced and applied in many different ways throughout campus, as administrative burdens and scale make it difficult to oversee large numbers of employees. More generally, as junior scholars, grad students, and/or individuals doing cultural studies work, does it make more sense for us to do deep and nuanced readings of theorists such as Marx and Althusser in our work, or to cite others who have expanded these traditions over the years?
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?
Post a Comment
Read more