Skip to main content

Week 6

 Grossberg tells us that because audiences are so large, critics have identified ways of separating them into smaller subgroups, mainly based on shared taste and shared identity. Both of these position the audience as existing outside of their interaction with the media; audiences are already formed and bring their own resources to the interaction with media. Grossberg argues that these ways of partitioning off audiences do not consider how texts construct their own appropriate audiences. In other words, they don’t consider how audiences’ identities may be constituted during their interaction with media, not before or after it. My question is, can we think of possible strategies for how media can create appropriate audiences?  Are there examples of how media has created a specific subgroup of audience?

I was interested in Hall’s characterization of communicative institutions, practices, and relations as lines of tendential force that serve as powerful barriers to the potential for rearticulation. How do we see examples of this characterization in our present communicative institutions and how can we rearticulate them?


-Daisy 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2/2 Discussion Questions

Althusser makes a point that ISAs operate as "unified" under the ruling ideology. To what extent are certain ISAs unified if they are "the site of class struggle" playing out, holding the potential for "ruptures" (to use Hall's phrase) with dominant ideologies? Here, I am thinking about the University of Iowa's COVID policies and how its rules are practiced and applied in many different ways throughout campus, as administrative burdens and scale make it difficult to oversee large numbers of employees. More generally, as junior scholars, grad students, and/or individuals doing cultural studies work, does it make more sense for us to do deep and nuanced readings of theorists such as Marx and Althusser in our work, or to cite others who have expanded these traditions over the years?
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?
Post a Comment
Read more