Skip to main content

Ideology, Marxism & the State

 Hi Everyone,


Here are my questions for the week:

1. What are the particular interventions Hall makes with Marxist thought? I’m wondering what Hall finds useful and what Hall identifies as not useful in Marx’s work. In short, what is Hall’s intervention? What is Hall referring to when he says “Marxism without final guarantees” and what is that relationship to do with the concept of determinacy/determinate? (44) What role does Gramsci play in this intervention? I guess I am trying to understand how Hall understands Marx as useful to a cultural studies project.

2. Althusser’s reading unpacks the structure and function of ideology. In it he states, “I shall say rather that every State Apparatus, whether Repressive or Ideological, ‘functions’ both by violence and by ideology.” (154) How does the work of Althusser connect with Hall? What is the relationship between the State, ideology, and cultural studies? Do questions of ideology necessitate us to begin with questions concerning the State? What does this approach afford us? Are there limits to this approach?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2/2 Discussion Questions

Althusser makes a point that ISAs operate as "unified" under the ruling ideology. To what extent are certain ISAs unified if they are "the site of class struggle" playing out, holding the potential for "ruptures" (to use Hall's phrase) with dominant ideologies? Here, I am thinking about the University of Iowa's COVID policies and how its rules are practiced and applied in many different ways throughout campus, as administrative burdens and scale make it difficult to oversee large numbers of employees. More generally, as junior scholars, grad students, and/or individuals doing cultural studies work, does it make more sense for us to do deep and nuanced readings of theorists such as Marx and Althusser in our work, or to cite others who have expanded these traditions over the years?
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?
Post a Comment
Read more