Skip to main content

On Classroom Communities and Political Prizes

As I am co-facilitating discussion this week I will keep this post briefer than usual. I will make room, however, to note that these readings were very generative; I imagine I will refer back to many of the articles (especially Hall and Giroux) in coming months. These questions may appear in some form during our class presentation so please feel very welcome to leave them until then! 

1. In light of Morley's presentation of Hall as someone cared more about the production of questions than the "production of definitive Answers or Theories" (253) and Kiang's aim to "create community in the classroom" (50) I ask: 

When teaching, how can we build our own classroom communities that value questions above dogmatic theories?  

a. Have you experienced a set of students, like Kiang, who have arrived in the classroom with a premeditated attempt to disrupt? If so, how did you approach resolving the issue without "failing to invest" (58) in other students? 

2. Hall describes the Labour Party as “a prize waiting to be won, if only that transformation, from an Old Left to a New Left party could be brought about” (495). This reminded us of the ongoing struggle within the contemporary Democratic Party to primary centrists and replace them with progressives—do you see any similar parallels? 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Addressing the Crisis: Your Collective Digital Stories

https://www.wevideo.com/view/2668669034    https://www.wevideo.com/view/2665696438  https://vimeo.com/695272441  https://www.youtube.com/embed/BN2wDbBLMWo https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pggTZblBzhQ5Nd6d8MU7jg28kBV0WixT https://www.wevideo.com/view/2648072657  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tUBup-RbbiCCl9-pWoOCvs2JFbUJYvhC/ https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Eed6_fpya8WOfEb0Hjhd4jySuMgi8fI0/

On Journals and Prose

My two questions from this week have emerged from the Judith Butler piece, A 'Bad Writer' Bites Back , both centered around the journal, Philosophy and Literature —which Butler describes as the self-proclaimed “arbiter of good prose.”  I agree with Butler’s staunch defense of questioning common sense and provoking “new ways of looking at a familiar world”, and was reminded of David Harvey’s quote in the introduction to his Companion to Marx’s Capital : “Real learning always entails a struggle to understand the unknown.”   Butler describes Philosophy and Literature as a “culturally conservative academic journal” which naturally led me down a longer-than-anticipated visit to the journal's website . I was greeted with a video presented by the Philosophy and Literature’s editor Garry L. Hagberg, who rails against the “jargon infested” work that litters the journal’s field, locating Philosophy and Literature in clear opposition to such bothersome clutter.  However, Hagberg...