Skip to main content

On Classroom Communities and Political Prizes

As I am co-facilitating discussion this week I will keep this post briefer than usual. I will make room, however, to note that these readings were very generative; I imagine I will refer back to many of the articles (especially Hall and Giroux) in coming months. These questions may appear in some form during our class presentation so please feel very welcome to leave them until then! 

1. In light of Morley's presentation of Hall as someone cared more about the production of questions than the "production of definitive Answers or Theories" (253) and Kiang's aim to "create community in the classroom" (50) I ask: 

When teaching, how can we build our own classroom communities that value questions above dogmatic theories?  

a. Have you experienced a set of students, like Kiang, who have arrived in the classroom with a premeditated attempt to disrupt? If so, how did you approach resolving the issue without "failing to invest" (58) in other students? 

2. Hall describes the Labour Party as “a prize waiting to be won, if only that transformation, from an Old Left to a New Left party could be brought about” (495). This reminded us of the ongoing struggle within the contemporary Democratic Party to primary centrists and replace them with progressives—do you see any similar parallels? 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2/2 Discussion Questions

Althusser makes a point that ISAs operate as "unified" under the ruling ideology. To what extent are certain ISAs unified if they are "the site of class struggle" playing out, holding the potential for "ruptures" (to use Hall's phrase) with dominant ideologies? Here, I am thinking about the University of Iowa's COVID policies and how its rules are practiced and applied in many different ways throughout campus, as administrative burdens and scale make it difficult to oversee large numbers of employees. More generally, as junior scholars, grad students, and/or individuals doing cultural studies work, does it make more sense for us to do deep and nuanced readings of theorists such as Marx and Althusser in our work, or to cite others who have expanded these traditions over the years?

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?