Skip to main content

On Ideology

I was glad to finally read the writing of Louis Althusser this week—I am well acquainted with his name but, until this class, was yet to examine his work. Althusser’s differentiation between ideological State Apparatuses (ISAs) and the (Repressive) State Apparatus (SA) invited me to consider how these often function in tandem to disrupt and destabilize campaigns for social justice such as Black Lives Matter. Police intimidate and beat protestors, while the courts effectively criminalize protests through heavy fines and prison sentences (SA). At the same time, ‘news’ stations (the communications ISA) frame the protestors as a vicious threat to society—‘society’ of course, being the status quo—and legitimize the implementation of violent SA through calls for law and order. Beyond protests, demands for the banning of Critical Race Theory and books that discuss racism are a further example of the utilization of ISAs to suppress movements for racial justice. 


In a footnote, Althusser states “The class struggle is thus expressed and exercised in ideological forms, thus also in the ideological forms of the ISAs. But the class struggle extends far beyond these forms, and it is because it extends beyond them that the struggle of the exploited classes may also be exercised in the forms of the ISAs, and thus turn the weapon of ideology against the classes in power.” This passage relates to my first question: 


In what ways can the exploited classes “turn the weapon of ideology against the classes in power”? 

a. Could this refer to organizations such as independent media outlets, and/or decentralized forms of education such as reading groups?


As Hall discusses in The Problem of Ideology: Marxism without Guarantees, mediation on ideology formed a focal point for the western European marxist intellectual scene. My second question concerns this ferment of thought and asks: 


Were marxist intellectuals from outside of western Europe as ‘preoccupied’ with ideology during the same time period? 

a. What, so far, have been the major developments of Marxist thought in the 21st century? 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2/2 Discussion Questions

Althusser makes a point that ISAs operate as "unified" under the ruling ideology. To what extent are certain ISAs unified if they are "the site of class struggle" playing out, holding the potential for "ruptures" (to use Hall's phrase) with dominant ideologies? Here, I am thinking about the University of Iowa's COVID policies and how its rules are practiced and applied in many different ways throughout campus, as administrative burdens and scale make it difficult to oversee large numbers of employees. More generally, as junior scholars, grad students, and/or individuals doing cultural studies work, does it make more sense for us to do deep and nuanced readings of theorists such as Marx and Althusser in our work, or to cite others who have expanded these traditions over the years?

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?