Skip to main content

On Ideology

I was glad to finally read the writing of Louis Althusser this week—I am well acquainted with his name but, until this class, was yet to examine his work. Althusser’s differentiation between ideological State Apparatuses (ISAs) and the (Repressive) State Apparatus (SA) invited me to consider how these often function in tandem to disrupt and destabilize campaigns for social justice such as Black Lives Matter. Police intimidate and beat protestors, while the courts effectively criminalize protests through heavy fines and prison sentences (SA). At the same time, ‘news’ stations (the communications ISA) frame the protestors as a vicious threat to society—‘society’ of course, being the status quo—and legitimize the implementation of violent SA through calls for law and order. Beyond protests, demands for the banning of Critical Race Theory and books that discuss racism are a further example of the utilization of ISAs to suppress movements for racial justice. 


In a footnote, Althusser states “The class struggle is thus expressed and exercised in ideological forms, thus also in the ideological forms of the ISAs. But the class struggle extends far beyond these forms, and it is because it extends beyond them that the struggle of the exploited classes may also be exercised in the forms of the ISAs, and thus turn the weapon of ideology against the classes in power.” This passage relates to my first question: 


In what ways can the exploited classes “turn the weapon of ideology against the classes in power”? 

a. Could this refer to organizations such as independent media outlets, and/or decentralized forms of education such as reading groups?


As Hall discusses in The Problem of Ideology: Marxism without Guarantees, mediation on ideology formed a focal point for the western European marxist intellectual scene. My second question concerns this ferment of thought and asks: 


Were marxist intellectuals from outside of western Europe as ‘preoccupied’ with ideology during the same time period? 

a. What, so far, have been the major developments of Marxist thought in the 21st century? 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Journals and Prose

My two questions from this week have emerged from the Judith Butler piece, A 'Bad Writer' Bites Back , both centered around the journal, Philosophy and Literature —which Butler describes as the self-proclaimed “arbiter of good prose.”  I agree with Butler’s staunch defense of questioning common sense and provoking “new ways of looking at a familiar world”, and was reminded of David Harvey’s quote in the introduction to his Companion to Marx’s Capital : “Real learning always entails a struggle to understand the unknown.”   Butler describes Philosophy and Literature as a “culturally conservative academic journal” which naturally led me down a longer-than-anticipated visit to the journal's website . I was greeted with a video presented by the Philosophy and Literature’s editor Garry L. Hagberg, who rails against the “jargon infested” work that litters the journal’s field, locating Philosophy and Literature in clear opposition to such bothersome clutter.  However, Hagberg...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?
Post a Comment
Read more

Corrine's Op Ed

       Although the Grammy’s “rebranded” their “urban” music award in 2020 after being taken to task by Tyler, the Creator for using the term to cover all black artists, regardless of their chosen genre, its lingering presence can still be felt in the new “Progressive R&B” award that has taken its place. Where Tyler, the Creator and other artists argued for more diverse genres that allow for broader categorizations for “people who look like [him],” the Grammy’s simply tucked one category into the other, reflecting how “urban” and R&B are both intrinsically linked and coded to the Grammy’s board as “black music.” This neat folding away of urban back into R&B seems to be unhelpful at best and reductive at worst, and has serious repercussions for us all, artist or otherwise: the pigeonholing of black art/ ists into essentialized categories allows for only a few forms of blackness to be legitimated through the Grammy system, but it also reflects the rigid bo...
Post a Comment
Read more