Skip to main content

Responding Reflectively to Ruptures

In “The Great Moving Nowhere Show,” Hall discusses Blairism and the politics of the status quo veiled in the language of progress. My own opinion of the current social and political reality in the United States is that we are in the beginning stages of a cultural moment in which people are refusing to accept the status quo and the ways in which politicians pay lip service to progress while abandoning their constituents and favoring the needs of wealthy, corporate donors over the physical, mental, emotional, moral, spiritual, and economic wellbeing of the people.

I came across a thread on Twitter recently, which has since been deleted or I would post it, and the gist of the thread was, “We have come to a moment where radical changes are necessary because the incremental changes that would have worked twenty years ago with climate change, livable wages, healthcare, gun regulation, police brutality, and so many other issues facing society were blocked at every turn by politicians and power brokers seeking to preserve the status quo.” I connect this to a famous quote from John F. Kennedy, which he said in 1962, “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.” My fear is that people’s disillusionment is moving more people to the right because conservatives are using outrage, which comes with the illusion of control, to create political momentum. Outrage is easy to cultivate and sustain as a political force, whereas organizing disparate groups of people around a common, complicated cause is immensely difficult, which leads to my question:

To what degree do the ruptures of the last several years--Trump’s election, COVID, George Floyd, to name a few--serve hegemonistic interests in moving people to the right, and in what ways can the left use these moments of rupture to better organize their own ideological apparatuses while exposing the flawed rhetoric of conservative political leaders?

My next question is more education-focused, and it concerns a moment in “The Great Moving Right Show,” which describes a political reality stemming from economic rupture in which the working class is forced to accept an “educational subordinate class” (184) status with "panic over falling standards and working-class illiteracy, the fears concerning politically-motivated teachers in the classroom, the scare stories about the 'violent' urban school...successfully [turning] the education sphere towards themes and goals being established for it by the forces of the right" (182). This shift comes with a push for “standard training, acceptable social skills, respect for authority, and traditional values, and discipline” (184) and I think we see this happening right now with interest groups in America funding parent organizations who are seeking to control what happens in their children’s schools.

If we are seeing a push for an “educational subordinate class” in America’s education system, how can educators organize their best efforts in exposing and subverting the true intent behind attempts to limit curriculum?

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Journals and Prose

My two questions from this week have emerged from the Judith Butler piece, A 'Bad Writer' Bites Back , both centered around the journal, Philosophy and Literature —which Butler describes as the self-proclaimed “arbiter of good prose.”  I agree with Butler’s staunch defense of questioning common sense and provoking “new ways of looking at a familiar world”, and was reminded of David Harvey’s quote in the introduction to his Companion to Marx’s Capital : “Real learning always entails a struggle to understand the unknown.”   Butler describes Philosophy and Literature as a “culturally conservative academic journal” which naturally led me down a longer-than-anticipated visit to the journal's website . I was greeted with a video presented by the Philosophy and Literature’s editor Garry L. Hagberg, who rails against the “jargon infested” work that litters the journal’s field, locating Philosophy and Literature in clear opposition to such bothersome clutter.  However, Hagberg...
Post a Comment
Read more

Articulation_by_Abby Escatel

 In "Race, Articulation and Societies Structured in Dominance," Stuart Hall is concerned with complicating Marxist theory's tendency to overgeneralize and universalize its claims that are specifically located within a European history of labor. Questions concerning slavery, coloniality, unfree/forced labor come to the fore and force Marxist theorists to grapple with the need to be specific in their contextualization and historicization of particular moments, ruptures and conjunctures. My questions are as follows:  1. How do we move forward with Marxism while taking into account the component of "unfreedom" when conceptualizing class, labor, and labor power? How does the "proletariat" fail to account for the lived realities of racialized bodies?  2. It seems as though Hall is also saying that race is not all encompassing and also shouldn't be overgeneralized/universalized. In short, labor and race are both always already at work. As a scholar who ce...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 5

  What are the differences between Gramsci’s concept of the “organic intellectual” and Hall’s “public pedagogy?”   On the topic of the diasporic intellectual, Kuan-Hsing Chen mentions that “Some of the diasporic intellectuals I know of have exercised their power, for better or worse, back home, but you have not. And some of them are trying to move back, in whatever way. So, in that sense, you are very peculiar” (503). Although Hall felt some reconnection with the Carribean through the Black diasporic population in Britain, he insists that cultural identity is not fixed but “comes out of very specific historical formations, out of very specific histories and cultural repertoires of enunciation, that it can constitute a ‘positionality’, which we call, provisionally, identity” (503). Individuals can negotiate, rearticulate, recontextualize their different identities, but how does this rearticulation work at an institutional-level?   Thelma
Post a Comment
Read more