Skip to main content

Week 4 Thoughts

I found myself most drawn to Hall’s description of what happened in education during the swing to the right. He describes how, in essence, the dominant strategy in schools was to prepare students for the workforce. As Hall puts it, “success in education = requirements of the industry.” Through this strategy there arose “educational competition”: who has the most training. Hall kind of gets at what we see happening in our present times (and within our own sphere of academia); the race to get the most accolades or the highest degrees in a field to be competitive in the job market. How can we tackle this competition which sends the signal that awards/medals/degrees might serve one better than learning for learning’s sake?

With Hall’s “The great moving nowhere show” article, I kept going back to his conclusion that “the Blair project, in its overall analysis and key assumptions, is still essentially framed by and moving on terrain defined by Thatcherism.” This made me think about how it is possible to discursively frame something old as something new. Obviously, the New Labour Party and their “Third Way” approach managed to appear “new” and “exciting” for at least some, so my question is, how do we get past these false labels to be able to see what is the essence of a thing? 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Articulation_by_Abby Escatel

 In "Race, Articulation and Societies Structured in Dominance," Stuart Hall is concerned with complicating Marxist theory's tendency to overgeneralize and universalize its claims that are specifically located within a European history of labor. Questions concerning slavery, coloniality, unfree/forced labor come to the fore and force Marxist theorists to grapple with the need to be specific in their contextualization and historicization of particular moments, ruptures and conjunctures. My questions are as follows:  1. How do we move forward with Marxism while taking into account the component of "unfreedom" when conceptualizing class, labor, and labor power? How does the "proletariat" fail to account for the lived realities of racialized bodies?  2. It seems as though Hall is also saying that race is not all encompassing and also shouldn't be overgeneralized/universalized. In short, labor and race are both always already at work. As a scholar who ce...

Pedagogy vs. the indulgence of regressive politics (a. darryl moton)

I deeply hate to focus on merely one aspect of the incredibly rich texts we read for this week, but I stopped clearly on this paragraph from the Giroux: These are hard times for educators and advocates of democratic schooling. Beseiged by the growing forces of vocationalism and the neoconservative cultural warriors, prospective and existing classroom teachers are caught in an ideological crossfire regarding the civic and political responsibilities they assume as engaged critics and cultural theorists. Asked to define themselves either through the language of the marketplace or through a discourse of liberal objectivity and neutrality that abstracts the political from the realm of the cultural and sopcial, educators are increasingly being pressured to become either servants of corporate power or disengaged specialists wedded to the imperatives of a resurgent and debasing academic professionalism.(343) Having taught in high schools in the early-to-mid-2000s, I witnessed firsthand both...

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?