Skip to main content

Week 5 by mad and hopeless Mengmeng

 I really enjoyed the conversation in this week's readings, especially Kiang's thoughtful articulation of the dilemmas and resistance of a POC non-tenure faculty in university. 

1. As an ESL student, I have some experience with the ESL program at U Iowa. I was shocked (pleasantly surprised) by Kiang's piece that the teacher of an ESL class is a POC and has an ESL background. The fact that even wrestling with the questions of power and oppression in an ESL course happened there shows how terrible Iowa and many other ESL programs in the US are. ESL classes in Iowa teach assimilation, not resistance. They are taught by white teachers who LOVE other cultures and travel in the global south. This situation is just a small reflection of how the college education in Iowa and US is a neoliberal capitalist business, promoting a tokenist and patronizing diversity, instead of serving students of color and teaching critical thinking. The story about the POC faculty on the tenure track growing distance from his original activism saddens me. This is what the current tenure system does to individuals, to separate us, to break community. What can we do as graduate students, scholar-activist, and POC in this hostile environment that increasingly tries to oppress critical thinking and anti-racist pedagogy? 

2. This conversation about pedagogy applies so well to today's college political dynamic around COVID, like why isn't we allow to even discuss people's choice on wearing masks in classrooms?? It is surreal to me that we are demanded by the university to just pretend nothing has happened to the past two years with so many people lost their lives and continue to lose their lives. To see my students not wearing masks, I genuinely want to have a conversation with them on their reasons. Everyone will grow old one day (maybe not Jeff Bezos), so if young people today don't give a shit about elders and the immunocompromised who they will eventually become, how can we expect they practice anti-racism in their lives, since they are not gonna grow to a different race or be racialized in an oppressed way in a white supremacy society??? Or is COVID so politicalized in a polarized way, people just oppose the other side so badly that they don't even think?? Isn't the basic thing in education critical thinking???

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Addressing the Crisis: Your Collective Digital Stories

https://www.wevideo.com/view/2668669034    https://www.wevideo.com/view/2665696438  https://vimeo.com/695272441  https://www.youtube.com/embed/BN2wDbBLMWo https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pggTZblBzhQ5Nd6d8MU7jg28kBV0WixT https://www.wevideo.com/view/2648072657  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tUBup-RbbiCCl9-pWoOCvs2JFbUJYvhC/ https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Eed6_fpya8WOfEb0Hjhd4jySuMgi8fI0/

On Journals and Prose

My two questions from this week have emerged from the Judith Butler piece, A 'Bad Writer' Bites Back , both centered around the journal, Philosophy and Literature —which Butler describes as the self-proclaimed “arbiter of good prose.”  I agree with Butler’s staunch defense of questioning common sense and provoking “new ways of looking at a familiar world”, and was reminded of David Harvey’s quote in the introduction to his Companion to Marx’s Capital : “Real learning always entails a struggle to understand the unknown.”   Butler describes Philosophy and Literature as a “culturally conservative academic journal” which naturally led me down a longer-than-anticipated visit to the journal's website . I was greeted with a video presented by the Philosophy and Literature’s editor Garry L. Hagberg, who rails against the “jargon infested” work that litters the journal’s field, locating Philosophy and Literature in clear opposition to such bothersome clutter.  However, Hagberg...