Skip to main content

Week 5 Questions

 Kiang in “Crossing Boundaries, Building Community” brings forward the complications of being a tenure track professor while also trying to challenge academia and create communities with students that engages with race, power, and culture. In this challenge, Kiang reflects on the positionality of a particular professor as they rejected being the pillar of such a movement considering their tenure track position. Examining Kiang’s example, there is an interesting dynamic between responsible modes of community building with POC students/ faculty relationships and the tokenization's of POC faculty members in the workspace by their peers and students. How can these dynamics be examined and what are the implications for higher education institutions and the environment they create? 

 

In “Crossing Boundaries, Building Community” Kiang describes his approach in the classroom as an adoption of Mae Tse Tung ’s basic organizing principle (unite with the advanced to win over the middle and isolate the backwards). When assessing his relationship with this framework he asks “Who are the advanced that I must not take for granted? Where can I have the most meaningful impact for both the short-term and long-term? As a scholar and educator that is attempting to break hegemonic practices in the classroom and academia, how do we further this discussion on who the “advance” represents in our daily practices? 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2/2 Discussion Questions

Althusser makes a point that ISAs operate as "unified" under the ruling ideology. To what extent are certain ISAs unified if they are "the site of class struggle" playing out, holding the potential for "ruptures" (to use Hall's phrase) with dominant ideologies? Here, I am thinking about the University of Iowa's COVID policies and how its rules are practiced and applied in many different ways throughout campus, as administrative burdens and scale make it difficult to oversee large numbers of employees. More generally, as junior scholars, grad students, and/or individuals doing cultural studies work, does it make more sense for us to do deep and nuanced readings of theorists such as Marx and Althusser in our work, or to cite others who have expanded these traditions over the years?
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?
Post a Comment
Read more