Skip to main content

Week 5 Thoughts

Giroux has a great rebuttal for Todd Gitlin’s critique of social movements organized around gender, race, sexual orientation, multiculturalism that, according to Gatlin, overlook the more ‘real politics’ of economic inequality and class. Giroux uses Hall’s insight that class is lived through the modalities of race and gender to show how social movements organized around racial and gendered issues expose how these issues are connected to class-based politics (example: the social movement ACT UP, which tried to make AIDS visible, exposed how AIDS was taking its greatest toll on poor black women). My question is, can we think of social movements that are seemingly organized around class issues, but which also expose how race and gender are tied up in class politics. As I am writing this, I am thinking of Matthew Desmond’s book Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City, a study of how eight families in Milwaukee struggled with poverty and home insecurity. Although the families are all struggling, Desmond points out how their experiences are lived through the modalities of race and gender. For example, he points out that poor black women are more likely to get evicted. He also points out how white landlords are more willing to overlook crime records of white people than of black people.

How do Peter N. Kiang’s practices as an instructor and fellow coworker in the College of Education reflect Giroux’s theory of critical public pedagogy? How might Gitlin and others’ critique of cultural politics be compared to the arguments made by the core of students opposing Kiang’s teaching methods?

-Daisy 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2/2 Discussion Questions

Althusser makes a point that ISAs operate as "unified" under the ruling ideology. To what extent are certain ISAs unified if they are "the site of class struggle" playing out, holding the potential for "ruptures" (to use Hall's phrase) with dominant ideologies? Here, I am thinking about the University of Iowa's COVID policies and how its rules are practiced and applied in many different ways throughout campus, as administrative burdens and scale make it difficult to oversee large numbers of employees. More generally, as junior scholars, grad students, and/or individuals doing cultural studies work, does it make more sense for us to do deep and nuanced readings of theorists such as Marx and Althusser in our work, or to cite others who have expanded these traditions over the years?

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?