Skip to main content

Corrine's Deconstruction of Hall's Deconstruction of Popular Culture

 I just want to first say that I *loved* the readings for this week. Encoding/decoding has been fundamental to my work as a media studies scholar, and "Notes on Deconstructing 'the Popular'" has been... well once again fundamental to my work as a popular culture scholar :-) Super excited for our conversations tomorrow!

1. I'm interested in one of the final lines of Hall's "What is this 'Black' in Black Popular Culture?" Hall states that popular culture is not "the arena where we find who we really are, the truth of our experience. It is an arena that is profoundly mythic...it is where we discover and play with the identifications of ourselves, where we are imagined, where we are represented, not only to the audiences out there who do not get the message, but to ourselves for the first time" (477). This line really struck me, not because I see popular culture as some profound form of truth, but because I had not thought about the "mythic" nature of it before; I could not help but think of Baudrillard's simulacrum here. Is popular culture the terrain that has been constructed out of representation? (I hope the way I worded this made sense. I have the hardest time talking about most of Baudrillard's work in general, but simulacra/simulation has always been particularly difficult for me to wrap my mind around)! 

2. Another question I have is more general from across the readings. How can we negotiate the fact that, as Hall argues, popular culture does not turn us into cultural dopes or manipulate us, with the fact that sometimes, it does? For example, I'm thinking here of how Mars Inc. recently rebranded their M&Ms characters in the name of "inclusion," causing controversy, conveniently around the time it was hit with a large child slavery lawsuit: it is readily apparent by a quick Google search of either issue which was discussed in popular culture more. I really am so committed to the belief that audiences are active and are fundamentally not cultural dopes, but I think there are moments where it is apparent that some forms of obfuscation at best and deception and worst occur; I do wonder what these moments tell us about the terrain of popular culture at large.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Journals and Prose

My two questions from this week have emerged from the Judith Butler piece, A 'Bad Writer' Bites Back , both centered around the journal, Philosophy and Literature —which Butler describes as the self-proclaimed “arbiter of good prose.”  I agree with Butler’s staunch defense of questioning common sense and provoking “new ways of looking at a familiar world”, and was reminded of David Harvey’s quote in the introduction to his Companion to Marx’s Capital : “Real learning always entails a struggle to understand the unknown.”   Butler describes Philosophy and Literature as a “culturally conservative academic journal” which naturally led me down a longer-than-anticipated visit to the journal's website . I was greeted with a video presented by the Philosophy and Literature’s editor Garry L. Hagberg, who rails against the “jargon infested” work that litters the journal’s field, locating Philosophy and Literature in clear opposition to such bothersome clutter.  However, Hagberg...
Post a Comment
Read more

Articulation_by_Abby Escatel

 In "Race, Articulation and Societies Structured in Dominance," Stuart Hall is concerned with complicating Marxist theory's tendency to overgeneralize and universalize its claims that are specifically located within a European history of labor. Questions concerning slavery, coloniality, unfree/forced labor come to the fore and force Marxist theorists to grapple with the need to be specific in their contextualization and historicization of particular moments, ruptures and conjunctures. My questions are as follows:  1. How do we move forward with Marxism while taking into account the component of "unfreedom" when conceptualizing class, labor, and labor power? How does the "proletariat" fail to account for the lived realities of racialized bodies?  2. It seems as though Hall is also saying that race is not all encompassing and also shouldn't be overgeneralized/universalized. In short, labor and race are both always already at work. As a scholar who ce...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 5

  What are the differences between Gramsci’s concept of the “organic intellectual” and Hall’s “public pedagogy?”   On the topic of the diasporic intellectual, Kuan-Hsing Chen mentions that “Some of the diasporic intellectuals I know of have exercised their power, for better or worse, back home, but you have not. And some of them are trying to move back, in whatever way. So, in that sense, you are very peculiar” (503). Although Hall felt some reconnection with the Carribean through the Black diasporic population in Britain, he insists that cultural identity is not fixed but “comes out of very specific historical formations, out of very specific histories and cultural repertoires of enunciation, that it can constitute a ‘positionality’, which we call, provisionally, identity” (503). Individuals can negotiate, rearticulate, recontextualize their different identities, but how does this rearticulation work at an institutional-level?   Thelma
Post a Comment
Read more