Skip to main content

Corrine's Deconstruction of Hall's Deconstruction of Popular Culture

 I just want to first say that I *loved* the readings for this week. Encoding/decoding has been fundamental to my work as a media studies scholar, and "Notes on Deconstructing 'the Popular'" has been... well once again fundamental to my work as a popular culture scholar :-) Super excited for our conversations tomorrow!

1. I'm interested in one of the final lines of Hall's "What is this 'Black' in Black Popular Culture?" Hall states that popular culture is not "the arena where we find who we really are, the truth of our experience. It is an arena that is profoundly mythic...it is where we discover and play with the identifications of ourselves, where we are imagined, where we are represented, not only to the audiences out there who do not get the message, but to ourselves for the first time" (477). This line really struck me, not because I see popular culture as some profound form of truth, but because I had not thought about the "mythic" nature of it before; I could not help but think of Baudrillard's simulacrum here. Is popular culture the terrain that has been constructed out of representation? (I hope the way I worded this made sense. I have the hardest time talking about most of Baudrillard's work in general, but simulacra/simulation has always been particularly difficult for me to wrap my mind around)! 

2. Another question I have is more general from across the readings. How can we negotiate the fact that, as Hall argues, popular culture does not turn us into cultural dopes or manipulate us, with the fact that sometimes, it does? For example, I'm thinking here of how Mars Inc. recently rebranded their M&Ms characters in the name of "inclusion," causing controversy, conveniently around the time it was hit with a large child slavery lawsuit: it is readily apparent by a quick Google search of either issue which was discussed in popular culture more. I really am so committed to the belief that audiences are active and are fundamentally not cultural dopes, but I think there are moments where it is apparent that some forms of obfuscation at best and deception and worst occur; I do wonder what these moments tell us about the terrain of popular culture at large.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Journals and Prose

My two questions from this week have emerged from the Judith Butler piece, A 'Bad Writer' Bites Back , both centered around the journal, Philosophy and Literature —which Butler describes as the self-proclaimed “arbiter of good prose.”  I agree with Butler’s staunch defense of questioning common sense and provoking “new ways of looking at a familiar world”, and was reminded of David Harvey’s quote in the introduction to his Companion to Marx’s Capital : “Real learning always entails a struggle to understand the unknown.”   Butler describes Philosophy and Literature as a “culturally conservative academic journal” which naturally led me down a longer-than-anticipated visit to the journal's website . I was greeted with a video presented by the Philosophy and Literature’s editor Garry L. Hagberg, who rails against the “jargon infested” work that litters the journal’s field, locating Philosophy and Literature in clear opposition to such bothersome clutter.  However, Hagberg...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?
Post a Comment
Read more

Corrine's Op Ed

       Although the Grammy’s “rebranded” their “urban” music award in 2020 after being taken to task by Tyler, the Creator for using the term to cover all black artists, regardless of their chosen genre, its lingering presence can still be felt in the new “Progressive R&B” award that has taken its place. Where Tyler, the Creator and other artists argued for more diverse genres that allow for broader categorizations for “people who look like [him],” the Grammy’s simply tucked one category into the other, reflecting how “urban” and R&B are both intrinsically linked and coded to the Grammy’s board as “black music.” This neat folding away of urban back into R&B seems to be unhelpful at best and reductive at worst, and has serious repercussions for us all, artist or otherwise: the pigeonholing of black art/ ists into essentialized categories allows for only a few forms of blackness to be legitimated through the Grammy system, but it also reflects the rigid bo...
Post a Comment
Read more