Skip to main content

Griffin- Week 7 Questions

 

Hall writes about how essentialized identities are somewhat necessary to “win” space within cultural hegemony; when it comes to Blackness, “Where would we be, as bell hooks once remarked, without a touch of essentialism?” (475). Is this essentializing of a racial identity reproduced through production or reception of popular culture? In what ways are people told something is “Black” (or any other identity) versus it becomes “Black” because audiences say it is?

In Adorno and Horkheimer’s culture industries framework, is there space for meaningful decoding practices (as Hall would say)? Or does any attempt to construct the meaning of cultural commodities become a reinforcement of the culture industries?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2/2 Discussion Questions

Althusser makes a point that ISAs operate as "unified" under the ruling ideology. To what extent are certain ISAs unified if they are "the site of class struggle" playing out, holding the potential for "ruptures" (to use Hall's phrase) with dominant ideologies? Here, I am thinking about the University of Iowa's COVID policies and how its rules are practiced and applied in many different ways throughout campus, as administrative burdens and scale make it difficult to oversee large numbers of employees. More generally, as junior scholars, grad students, and/or individuals doing cultural studies work, does it make more sense for us to do deep and nuanced readings of theorists such as Marx and Althusser in our work, or to cite others who have expanded these traditions over the years?

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?