Skip to main content

Hall on Gramsci (John)

 In "Gramsci's Relevance for the Study of Race," Hall intervenes in debates surrounding the supposed limitations of Gramsci's theoretical contributions — specifically Anderson's claim that because Gramsci's central problematic was the failure of socialist revolution in "the West" and his preoccupation with "advanced" societies, this confined Gramsci to the "distinguished company of so-called 'western Marxists.'" (Race & Difference 300). Hall persuasively argues for the relevance of Gramsci to the study of race by historicizing Gramsci's thought — attending to the concrete political moments that propelled his thought, as well as the different levels at which his concepts operate. 


My questions this week follow from this essay: 


Hall perceives Anderson to have "commit[ted] the error of literalism" in his read of Gramsci. In essence, that is because Gramsci did not write of race in explicit terms; therefore, his concepts and theoretical formulations have little or no relevance to the study of race. What is it in Gramsci's concepts that Hall finds so powerfully relevant to understanding race? What can't we understand about race absent Gramsci's terms and formulations? I am also interested in how we might commit the error of literalism when we read all sorts of scholarship. How often do we fall prey to a literal reading of a text, and in what ways might that limit the work's theoretical capacity and application to political problems outside its supposed focus? 


In part II of Hall's essay, he raises the question of determination, a central and perpetual problematic in marxism. The notion of mechanical function or "simple expressive totality" does not allow us to conceptualize the political and ideological levels sufficiently: 


"This collapses Marx's somewhat problematic formulation — the economic as 'determining in the last instance' — to the reductionist principle that the economic determines, in an immediate way, the first, middle, and last instances. In this sense, 'economism' is a theoretical reductionism. It simplest the structure of social formations, reducing their complexity of articulation, vertical and horizontal, to a single line of determination. It simplest the very concept of determination' (which in Marx is actually a very complex idea) to that of a mechanical function." (Race and Difference, 302). 


My question: what is the relationship between time/space to determination?


(John)


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Journals and Prose

My two questions from this week have emerged from the Judith Butler piece, A 'Bad Writer' Bites Back , both centered around the journal, Philosophy and Literature —which Butler describes as the self-proclaimed “arbiter of good prose.”  I agree with Butler’s staunch defense of questioning common sense and provoking “new ways of looking at a familiar world”, and was reminded of David Harvey’s quote in the introduction to his Companion to Marx’s Capital : “Real learning always entails a struggle to understand the unknown.”   Butler describes Philosophy and Literature as a “culturally conservative academic journal” which naturally led me down a longer-than-anticipated visit to the journal's website . I was greeted with a video presented by the Philosophy and Literature’s editor Garry L. Hagberg, who rails against the “jargon infested” work that litters the journal’s field, locating Philosophy and Literature in clear opposition to such bothersome clutter.  However, Hagberg...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?
Post a Comment
Read more

Corrine's Op Ed

       Although the Grammy’s “rebranded” their “urban” music award in 2020 after being taken to task by Tyler, the Creator for using the term to cover all black artists, regardless of their chosen genre, its lingering presence can still be felt in the new “Progressive R&B” award that has taken its place. Where Tyler, the Creator and other artists argued for more diverse genres that allow for broader categorizations for “people who look like [him],” the Grammy’s simply tucked one category into the other, reflecting how “urban” and R&B are both intrinsically linked and coded to the Grammy’s board as “black music.” This neat folding away of urban back into R&B seems to be unhelpful at best and reductive at worst, and has serious repercussions for us all, artist or otherwise: the pigeonholing of black art/ ists into essentialized categories allows for only a few forms of blackness to be legitimated through the Grammy system, but it also reflects the rigid bo...
Post a Comment
Read more