Skip to main content

Lost Father Patriarchy & other masculinities - Thelma

 In the beginning of their dialogue, Hall and hooks discuss the tension(s) of the feminist rupture in cultural studies and how it was misunderstood at the beginning of its formation. hooks explains many Black women intellectuals were too intimidated to engage in a feminist critique with their male counterparts because of their shared race. While on the other hand, some Black male intellectuals were reluctant to having their work transformed by feminist thinking. Although both Hall and hooks suggest that the hostility and initial resistance to the feminist rupture has already been forgotten, how do feminist or cultural studies continue to resist Black feminism today? 

I am also interested in the idea of the lost father patriarchy and hooks’s theory that Black masculinity is confined to heterosexist paradigms because of its “overwhelming fear of homosexuality” (26). Beyond feminist and queer studies, are there any other theoretical paradigms for examining the expression of Black masculinities? Does the idea of “toxic masculinity” further confine these expressions into heterosexist paradigms? 


We can also discuss the limitations of “toxic masculinity” in the context of a recent event: Will Smith’s response to Chris Rock’s misogynoir and ableism. A lot of viewers have labeled and dismissed Smith’s defense of Jada as toxic masculinity - a reaction primarily rooted in white feminism, carceral logics, and anti-Blackness. How do we, as intellectuals, respond to an event like this (if at all)? This is already too long (sorry), but I was surprised that Nikole Hannah-Jones referred to this moment as an "assault" and called Jada's chronic illness into question, asking "How is hair loss a disability specifically?" (she deleted this tweet already). I'm in no position to judge Hannah-Jones's response, but I think it does suggest that there are still some contingencies to bridging the gap between race and feminism in public discourse.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Journals and Prose

My two questions from this week have emerged from the Judith Butler piece, A 'Bad Writer' Bites Back , both centered around the journal, Philosophy and Literature —which Butler describes as the self-proclaimed “arbiter of good prose.”  I agree with Butler’s staunch defense of questioning common sense and provoking “new ways of looking at a familiar world”, and was reminded of David Harvey’s quote in the introduction to his Companion to Marx’s Capital : “Real learning always entails a struggle to understand the unknown.”   Butler describes Philosophy and Literature as a “culturally conservative academic journal” which naturally led me down a longer-than-anticipated visit to the journal's website . I was greeted with a video presented by the Philosophy and Literature’s editor Garry L. Hagberg, who rails against the “jargon infested” work that litters the journal’s field, locating Philosophy and Literature in clear opposition to such bothersome clutter.  However, Hagberg...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?
Post a Comment
Read more

Corrine's Op Ed

       Although the Grammy’s “rebranded” their “urban” music award in 2020 after being taken to task by Tyler, the Creator for using the term to cover all black artists, regardless of their chosen genre, its lingering presence can still be felt in the new “Progressive R&B” award that has taken its place. Where Tyler, the Creator and other artists argued for more diverse genres that allow for broader categorizations for “people who look like [him],” the Grammy’s simply tucked one category into the other, reflecting how “urban” and R&B are both intrinsically linked and coded to the Grammy’s board as “black music.” This neat folding away of urban back into R&B seems to be unhelpful at best and reductive at worst, and has serious repercussions for us all, artist or otherwise: the pigeonholing of black art/ ists into essentialized categories allows for only a few forms of blackness to be legitimated through the Grammy system, but it also reflects the rigid bo...
Post a Comment
Read more