Skip to main content

Lost Father Patriarchy & other masculinities - Thelma

 In the beginning of their dialogue, Hall and hooks discuss the tension(s) of the feminist rupture in cultural studies and how it was misunderstood at the beginning of its formation. hooks explains many Black women intellectuals were too intimidated to engage in a feminist critique with their male counterparts because of their shared race. While on the other hand, some Black male intellectuals were reluctant to having their work transformed by feminist thinking. Although both Hall and hooks suggest that the hostility and initial resistance to the feminist rupture has already been forgotten, how do feminist or cultural studies continue to resist Black feminism today? 

I am also interested in the idea of the lost father patriarchy and hooks’s theory that Black masculinity is confined to heterosexist paradigms because of its “overwhelming fear of homosexuality” (26). Beyond feminist and queer studies, are there any other theoretical paradigms for examining the expression of Black masculinities? Does the idea of “toxic masculinity” further confine these expressions into heterosexist paradigms? 


We can also discuss the limitations of “toxic masculinity” in the context of a recent event: Will Smith’s response to Chris Rock’s misogynoir and ableism. A lot of viewers have labeled and dismissed Smith’s defense of Jada as toxic masculinity - a reaction primarily rooted in white feminism, carceral logics, and anti-Blackness. How do we, as intellectuals, respond to an event like this (if at all)? This is already too long (sorry), but I was surprised that Nikole Hannah-Jones referred to this moment as an "assault" and called Jada's chronic illness into question, asking "How is hair loss a disability specifically?" (she deleted this tweet already). I'm in no position to judge Hannah-Jones's response, but I think it does suggest that there are still some contingencies to bridging the gap between race and feminism in public discourse.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2/2 Discussion Questions

Althusser makes a point that ISAs operate as "unified" under the ruling ideology. To what extent are certain ISAs unified if they are "the site of class struggle" playing out, holding the potential for "ruptures" (to use Hall's phrase) with dominant ideologies? Here, I am thinking about the University of Iowa's COVID policies and how its rules are practiced and applied in many different ways throughout campus, as administrative burdens and scale make it difficult to oversee large numbers of employees. More generally, as junior scholars, grad students, and/or individuals doing cultural studies work, does it make more sense for us to do deep and nuanced readings of theorists such as Marx and Althusser in our work, or to cite others who have expanded these traditions over the years?
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?
Post a Comment
Read more