Skip to main content

New Ethnicities + Digital Story (Thelma)

 In “Gramsci’s Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity,” Stuart Hall provides an overview of the many concepts that Gramsci uses in his theoretical work, such as hegemony, social formation, and the idea of the organic intellectual, and shows how these theories can be inflected by the category of race. Hall reminds us of the relevance of articulation when he writes “ideologies are not transformed or changed by replacing one, whole, already-formed conception of the world with another, so much as by ‘renovating and making critical an already existing activity’” (320). I would like to discuss the limitations of (re)articulation: Are there any examples of theoretical frameworks that cannot or should not be rearticulated? 

I am also interested in discussing the idea of decoupling ethnicity from state violence to produce new cultural practices. In “New Ethnicities,” Hall explains “We still have a great deal of work to do to decouple ethnicity, as it functions in the dominant discourse, from its equivalence with nationalism, imperialism, racism and the state, which are points of attachment around which a distinctive British, or, more accurately, English ethnicity have been constructed” (252). What are examples of a successful decoupling of ethnicity from nationalism, imperialism, etc. in contemporary pop culture? (we can also talk about the limitations of Lin Manuel-Miranda's Hamilton, if anyone is down.)

Also, below is the link to my digital story. I actually have two versions of the same story: one version is primarily told through open access video clips and then I started to get paranoid about it and created another video with just free images, haha. 😅 The link below is the original video, but the other version is under the same account. I've also provided recommended readings in the description if you're interested in learning more about premodern critical race studies and the Beowulf poem. 

https://vimeo.com/684851836

Comments

  1. Wow... This story so well articulated and edited. It's very poetic.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Journals and Prose

My two questions from this week have emerged from the Judith Butler piece, A 'Bad Writer' Bites Back , both centered around the journal, Philosophy and Literature —which Butler describes as the self-proclaimed “arbiter of good prose.”  I agree with Butler’s staunch defense of questioning common sense and provoking “new ways of looking at a familiar world”, and was reminded of David Harvey’s quote in the introduction to his Companion to Marx’s Capital : “Real learning always entails a struggle to understand the unknown.”   Butler describes Philosophy and Literature as a “culturally conservative academic journal” which naturally led me down a longer-than-anticipated visit to the journal's website . I was greeted with a video presented by the Philosophy and Literature’s editor Garry L. Hagberg, who rails against the “jargon infested” work that litters the journal’s field, locating Philosophy and Literature in clear opposition to such bothersome clutter.  However, Hagberg...

Articulation_by_Abby Escatel

 In "Race, Articulation and Societies Structured in Dominance," Stuart Hall is concerned with complicating Marxist theory's tendency to overgeneralize and universalize its claims that are specifically located within a European history of labor. Questions concerning slavery, coloniality, unfree/forced labor come to the fore and force Marxist theorists to grapple with the need to be specific in their contextualization and historicization of particular moments, ruptures and conjunctures. My questions are as follows:  1. How do we move forward with Marxism while taking into account the component of "unfreedom" when conceptualizing class, labor, and labor power? How does the "proletariat" fail to account for the lived realities of racialized bodies?  2. It seems as though Hall is also saying that race is not all encompassing and also shouldn't be overgeneralized/universalized. In short, labor and race are both always already at work. As a scholar who ce...

Week 5

  What are the differences between Gramsci’s concept of the “organic intellectual” and Hall’s “public pedagogy?”   On the topic of the diasporic intellectual, Kuan-Hsing Chen mentions that “Some of the diasporic intellectuals I know of have exercised their power, for better or worse, back home, but you have not. And some of them are trying to move back, in whatever way. So, in that sense, you are very peculiar” (503). Although Hall felt some reconnection with the Carribean through the Black diasporic population in Britain, he insists that cultural identity is not fixed but “comes out of very specific historical formations, out of very specific histories and cultural repertoires of enunciation, that it can constitute a ‘positionality’, which we call, provisionally, identity” (503). Individuals can negotiate, rearticulate, recontextualize their different identities, but how does this rearticulation work at an institutional-level?   Thelma