Skip to main content

Robert Taylor - High Art and Psychographics

There was a moment early in the Adorno and Horkheimer piece that discussed the distinction between “High Art” and “Mass Culture,” and I remembered a conversation from the Queer Performance class last semester that a few of us in this class took. The statement was about the movie Brüno as High Art, and I was struck by the claim at the time and again while I was reading this piece, given the movie’s place in Mass Culture. 


How have the boundaries between High Art and Mass Culture changed and what distinguishes one form of culture from the other?


I learned about the term “psychographics” recently with a group of students, and I was trying to connect it to the idea of “popular” culture. Psychographics seeks to define people based on aspirations, attitudes, and psychological dispositions, including hopes and fears. All people experience emotions in similar ways, and psychographics is an attempt to understand how people’s emotions affect their habits, and this gives marketers a way of making the same product appeal to different groups of people. With the advent of the internet and algorithms and data tracking, marketers can get a pretty good sense of a person’s emotional identity based on their internet habits, and they can reliably predict marketing strategies that will appeal to people with similar dispositions. Writing that out actually creeps me out a little. Someone with more marketing experience might know better than me, but that is my basic understanding. 


We often use the term “demographics” as a shorthand for the categorization and generalization of large groups of people in marketing research based on more “traditional” notions of identity: race, age, gender, sexuality, etc. Hall gives us good reason to doubt this method of defining blocs of people, and I agree with his criticisms. 


How might psychographics serve as a better lens for thinking about large groups of people and their experiences or is the whole point that trying to define and understand large groups of people together is a futile endeavor no matter what lens we use?

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2/2 Discussion Questions

Althusser makes a point that ISAs operate as "unified" under the ruling ideology. To what extent are certain ISAs unified if they are "the site of class struggle" playing out, holding the potential for "ruptures" (to use Hall's phrase) with dominant ideologies? Here, I am thinking about the University of Iowa's COVID policies and how its rules are practiced and applied in many different ways throughout campus, as administrative burdens and scale make it difficult to oversee large numbers of employees. More generally, as junior scholars, grad students, and/or individuals doing cultural studies work, does it make more sense for us to do deep and nuanced readings of theorists such as Marx and Althusser in our work, or to cite others who have expanded these traditions over the years?
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?
Post a Comment
Read more