Skip to main content

Robert Taylor - High Art and Psychographics

There was a moment early in the Adorno and Horkheimer piece that discussed the distinction between “High Art” and “Mass Culture,” and I remembered a conversation from the Queer Performance class last semester that a few of us in this class took. The statement was about the movie Brüno as High Art, and I was struck by the claim at the time and again while I was reading this piece, given the movie’s place in Mass Culture. 


How have the boundaries between High Art and Mass Culture changed and what distinguishes one form of culture from the other?


I learned about the term “psychographics” recently with a group of students, and I was trying to connect it to the idea of “popular” culture. Psychographics seeks to define people based on aspirations, attitudes, and psychological dispositions, including hopes and fears. All people experience emotions in similar ways, and psychographics is an attempt to understand how people’s emotions affect their habits, and this gives marketers a way of making the same product appeal to different groups of people. With the advent of the internet and algorithms and data tracking, marketers can get a pretty good sense of a person’s emotional identity based on their internet habits, and they can reliably predict marketing strategies that will appeal to people with similar dispositions. Writing that out actually creeps me out a little. Someone with more marketing experience might know better than me, but that is my basic understanding. 


We often use the term “demographics” as a shorthand for the categorization and generalization of large groups of people in marketing research based on more “traditional” notions of identity: race, age, gender, sexuality, etc. Hall gives us good reason to doubt this method of defining blocs of people, and I agree with his criticisms. 


How might psychographics serve as a better lens for thinking about large groups of people and their experiences or is the whole point that trying to define and understand large groups of people together is a futile endeavor no matter what lens we use?

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Journals and Prose

My two questions from this week have emerged from the Judith Butler piece, A 'Bad Writer' Bites Back , both centered around the journal, Philosophy and Literature —which Butler describes as the self-proclaimed “arbiter of good prose.”  I agree with Butler’s staunch defense of questioning common sense and provoking “new ways of looking at a familiar world”, and was reminded of David Harvey’s quote in the introduction to his Companion to Marx’s Capital : “Real learning always entails a struggle to understand the unknown.”   Butler describes Philosophy and Literature as a “culturally conservative academic journal” which naturally led me down a longer-than-anticipated visit to the journal's website . I was greeted with a video presented by the Philosophy and Literature’s editor Garry L. Hagberg, who rails against the “jargon infested” work that litters the journal’s field, locating Philosophy and Literature in clear opposition to such bothersome clutter.  However, Hagberg...
Post a Comment
Read more

Articulation_by_Abby Escatel

 In "Race, Articulation and Societies Structured in Dominance," Stuart Hall is concerned with complicating Marxist theory's tendency to overgeneralize and universalize its claims that are specifically located within a European history of labor. Questions concerning slavery, coloniality, unfree/forced labor come to the fore and force Marxist theorists to grapple with the need to be specific in their contextualization and historicization of particular moments, ruptures and conjunctures. My questions are as follows:  1. How do we move forward with Marxism while taking into account the component of "unfreedom" when conceptualizing class, labor, and labor power? How does the "proletariat" fail to account for the lived realities of racialized bodies?  2. It seems as though Hall is also saying that race is not all encompassing and also shouldn't be overgeneralized/universalized. In short, labor and race are both always already at work. As a scholar who ce...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 5

  What are the differences between Gramsci’s concept of the “organic intellectual” and Hall’s “public pedagogy?”   On the topic of the diasporic intellectual, Kuan-Hsing Chen mentions that “Some of the diasporic intellectuals I know of have exercised their power, for better or worse, back home, but you have not. And some of them are trying to move back, in whatever way. So, in that sense, you are very peculiar” (503). Although Hall felt some reconnection with the Carribean through the Black diasporic population in Britain, he insists that cultural identity is not fixed but “comes out of very specific historical formations, out of very specific histories and cultural repertoires of enunciation, that it can constitute a ‘positionality’, which we call, provisionally, identity” (503). Individuals can negotiate, rearticulate, recontextualize their different identities, but how does this rearticulation work at an institutional-level?   Thelma
Post a Comment
Read more