Skip to main content

Some thoughts.... by Rajorshi

I don’t know why instructors don’t assign texts like Uncut Funk. I am particularly touched by the reflections around death and dying, and what that meant for hooks and Hall. I agree that conversations, in general, are fluid and organic, as opposed to fancy conferences (5) and this text is an important reminder about how certain scholars don’t quite approach their personal lives with critical rigor. The praxis/theory binary is extremely redundant and dangerous. For instance, Lee Edelman’s No Future sounds like a piece of shit not only because it is exclusive to the white family but also because he is happily married in real life.

While I understand the danger of “heavy-handed political correctness” (12) and Evren Savci’s Queer in Translation is a recent intervention on that subject, I am not quite convinced by hooks and Hall’s references. The controversies over the Redemption Song episode and hooks’ remarks on Oprah are very specific and different, as is the criticism over Hall’s use of shit. Did Hall in particular consider who found these instances to be insensitive or even offensive? Were these voices demanding political correctness or accountability? Nowadays when people are quick to dismiss calling out culture in favor of calling in, the power dynamics are usually ignored. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2/2 Discussion Questions

Althusser makes a point that ISAs operate as "unified" under the ruling ideology. To what extent are certain ISAs unified if they are "the site of class struggle" playing out, holding the potential for "ruptures" (to use Hall's phrase) with dominant ideologies? Here, I am thinking about the University of Iowa's COVID policies and how its rules are practiced and applied in many different ways throughout campus, as administrative burdens and scale make it difficult to oversee large numbers of employees. More generally, as junior scholars, grad students, and/or individuals doing cultural studies work, does it make more sense for us to do deep and nuanced readings of theorists such as Marx and Althusser in our work, or to cite others who have expanded these traditions over the years?
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?
Post a Comment
Read more

Articulation_by_Abby Escatel

 In "Race, Articulation and Societies Structured in Dominance," Stuart Hall is concerned with complicating Marxist theory's tendency to overgeneralize and universalize its claims that are specifically located within a European history of labor. Questions concerning slavery, coloniality, unfree/forced labor come to the fore and force Marxist theorists to grapple with the need to be specific in their contextualization and historicization of particular moments, ruptures and conjunctures. My questions are as follows:  1. How do we move forward with Marxism while taking into account the component of "unfreedom" when conceptualizing class, labor, and labor power? How does the "proletariat" fail to account for the lived realities of racialized bodies?  2. It seems as though Hall is also saying that race is not all encompassing and also shouldn't be overgeneralized/universalized. In short, labor and race are both always already at work. As a scholar who ce...
Post a Comment
Read more