Skip to main content

The Popular_Abby Escatel

This week we read about what constitutes popular culture and the various processes involved in meaning making/reception. 

In Hall's "encoding/decoding" essay, we are offered a breakdown of the communicative events that encompass the productions and consumption of mass produced messaging (specifically with television). Hall unpacks the various levels of meaning and how those meanings are often overdetermined by historical and contextual "complex structures of dominance." He attempts to delink the naturalization of codification between encoding/decoding, by highlighting the interconnected layers of meanings, a process that begins at the level of language, between sign and signifier. He states, "There is no intelligible discourse without the operation of a code." In unpacking the struggle over meaning, that is the slippage between connotation and denotative meaning, he highlights the relationship between dominant hegemonic (ideally dominant encoded) messages and oppositional codes. How is the work of cultural studies invested in transgressing the hegemonic/dominant code? Is cultural studies a practice of oppositional decoding? What's at stake in this critical cultural project? 

In Hall's "What is this 'Black' in Black Popular Culture" he details his discontent with postmodernism's tendency to ignore/underplay racialized differences. He alludes to the "rupture of primitivism" and postmodernism's erasure as a "difference that may not make a difference." Alternatively he declares, "For we cannot forget how cultural life, above all in the West, but elsewhere as well, has been transformed in our lifetimes by the voicing of the margins." (470) He points to the struggle over cultural hegemony and finds hope in "cultural strategies that can make a difference, that's what I'm interested in--those that can make a difference and can shift the dispositions of power." (471) In contrast to high culture, or I would add the textual, what kinds of cultural production does this argument open up for us (i.e. music, poetry)? What does it mean to seek out alternative traditions and how do we remain cognizant of commodification of black (and ethnic) cultural forms? 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On Journals and Prose

My two questions from this week have emerged from the Judith Butler piece, A 'Bad Writer' Bites Back , both centered around the journal, Philosophy and Literature —which Butler describes as the self-proclaimed “arbiter of good prose.”  I agree with Butler’s staunch defense of questioning common sense and provoking “new ways of looking at a familiar world”, and was reminded of David Harvey’s quote in the introduction to his Companion to Marx’s Capital : “Real learning always entails a struggle to understand the unknown.”   Butler describes Philosophy and Literature as a “culturally conservative academic journal” which naturally led me down a longer-than-anticipated visit to the journal's website . I was greeted with a video presented by the Philosophy and Literature’s editor Garry L. Hagberg, who rails against the “jargon infested” work that litters the journal’s field, locating Philosophy and Literature in clear opposition to such bothersome clutter.  However, Hagberg...

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?

Corrine's Op Ed

       Although the Grammy’s “rebranded” their “urban” music award in 2020 after being taken to task by Tyler, the Creator for using the term to cover all black artists, regardless of their chosen genre, its lingering presence can still be felt in the new “Progressive R&B” award that has taken its place. Where Tyler, the Creator and other artists argued for more diverse genres that allow for broader categorizations for “people who look like [him],” the Grammy’s simply tucked one category into the other, reflecting how “urban” and R&B are both intrinsically linked and coded to the Grammy’s board as “black music.” This neat folding away of urban back into R&B seems to be unhelpful at best and reductive at worst, and has serious repercussions for us all, artist or otherwise: the pigeonholing of black art/ ists into essentialized categories allows for only a few forms of blackness to be legitimated through the Grammy system, but it also reflects the rigid bo...