Skip to main content

The Popular_Abby Escatel

This week we read about what constitutes popular culture and the various processes involved in meaning making/reception. 

In Hall's "encoding/decoding" essay, we are offered a breakdown of the communicative events that encompass the productions and consumption of mass produced messaging (specifically with television). Hall unpacks the various levels of meaning and how those meanings are often overdetermined by historical and contextual "complex structures of dominance." He attempts to delink the naturalization of codification between encoding/decoding, by highlighting the interconnected layers of meanings, a process that begins at the level of language, between sign and signifier. He states, "There is no intelligible discourse without the operation of a code." In unpacking the struggle over meaning, that is the slippage between connotation and denotative meaning, he highlights the relationship between dominant hegemonic (ideally dominant encoded) messages and oppositional codes. How is the work of cultural studies invested in transgressing the hegemonic/dominant code? Is cultural studies a practice of oppositional decoding? What's at stake in this critical cultural project? 

In Hall's "What is this 'Black' in Black Popular Culture" he details his discontent with postmodernism's tendency to ignore/underplay racialized differences. He alludes to the "rupture of primitivism" and postmodernism's erasure as a "difference that may not make a difference." Alternatively he declares, "For we cannot forget how cultural life, above all in the West, but elsewhere as well, has been transformed in our lifetimes by the voicing of the margins." (470) He points to the struggle over cultural hegemony and finds hope in "cultural strategies that can make a difference, that's what I'm interested in--those that can make a difference and can shift the dispositions of power." (471) In contrast to high culture, or I would add the textual, what kinds of cultural production does this argument open up for us (i.e. music, poetry)? What does it mean to seek out alternative traditions and how do we remain cognizant of commodification of black (and ethnic) cultural forms? 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Journals and Prose

My two questions from this week have emerged from the Judith Butler piece, A 'Bad Writer' Bites Back , both centered around the journal, Philosophy and Literature —which Butler describes as the self-proclaimed “arbiter of good prose.”  I agree with Butler’s staunch defense of questioning common sense and provoking “new ways of looking at a familiar world”, and was reminded of David Harvey’s quote in the introduction to his Companion to Marx’s Capital : “Real learning always entails a struggle to understand the unknown.”   Butler describes Philosophy and Literature as a “culturally conservative academic journal” which naturally led me down a longer-than-anticipated visit to the journal's website . I was greeted with a video presented by the Philosophy and Literature’s editor Garry L. Hagberg, who rails against the “jargon infested” work that litters the journal’s field, locating Philosophy and Literature in clear opposition to such bothersome clutter.  However, Hagberg...
Post a Comment
Read more

Articulation_by_Abby Escatel

 In "Race, Articulation and Societies Structured in Dominance," Stuart Hall is concerned with complicating Marxist theory's tendency to overgeneralize and universalize its claims that are specifically located within a European history of labor. Questions concerning slavery, coloniality, unfree/forced labor come to the fore and force Marxist theorists to grapple with the need to be specific in their contextualization and historicization of particular moments, ruptures and conjunctures. My questions are as follows:  1. How do we move forward with Marxism while taking into account the component of "unfreedom" when conceptualizing class, labor, and labor power? How does the "proletariat" fail to account for the lived realities of racialized bodies?  2. It seems as though Hall is also saying that race is not all encompassing and also shouldn't be overgeneralized/universalized. In short, labor and race are both always already at work. As a scholar who ce...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 5

  What are the differences between Gramsci’s concept of the “organic intellectual” and Hall’s “public pedagogy?”   On the topic of the diasporic intellectual, Kuan-Hsing Chen mentions that “Some of the diasporic intellectuals I know of have exercised their power, for better or worse, back home, but you have not. And some of them are trying to move back, in whatever way. So, in that sense, you are very peculiar” (503). Although Hall felt some reconnection with the Carribean through the Black diasporic population in Britain, he insists that cultural identity is not fixed but “comes out of very specific historical formations, out of very specific histories and cultural repertoires of enunciation, that it can constitute a ‘positionality’, which we call, provisionally, identity” (503). Individuals can negotiate, rearticulate, recontextualize their different identities, but how does this rearticulation work at an institutional-level?   Thelma
Post a Comment
Read more