Skip to main content

Uncut Funk

 Oh wow oh wow, this is by far my favorite reading of this semester (in this class but also I think out of all my classes!) and I am very much looking forward to discussing more in class. Towards the end of our reading for this week, hooks and Hall are discussing desire, reproduction, (the art of) dying, and aesthetics (of existence). This dialogue arose from a conversation about text, writing and content/form. In an argument for progressive transformation hooks emphasizes eroticization, play, and pleasure. hooks says “Our imagination is where out strength to resist lies” (46). How do we play with form within our own every day work within the academy and incorporate play and pleasure? Can we? Or do we, like hooks, need to exist inside and outside of it to do so? 


Masculinity was also a central topic of the dialogue we read so far. In one of my GWSS classes at Nova we had a week on masculinity studies, reading Brod’s “The Case for Men’s Studies” and Reeser’s Intro of Masculinities in Theory. Honestly at the time I may have been, in fact, resistant to it. Alas in the spirit of Hall’s own self-reflexivity, I think I was wrong to be so originally dismissive and not have given that dismissal much thought until now. Does masculinity studies need a more prominent role? Would/should that be separate of GWSS?  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2/2 Discussion Questions

Althusser makes a point that ISAs operate as "unified" under the ruling ideology. To what extent are certain ISAs unified if they are "the site of class struggle" playing out, holding the potential for "ruptures" (to use Hall's phrase) with dominant ideologies? Here, I am thinking about the University of Iowa's COVID policies and how its rules are practiced and applied in many different ways throughout campus, as administrative burdens and scale make it difficult to oversee large numbers of employees. More generally, as junior scholars, grad students, and/or individuals doing cultural studies work, does it make more sense for us to do deep and nuanced readings of theorists such as Marx and Althusser in our work, or to cite others who have expanded these traditions over the years?
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?
Post a Comment
Read more