Skip to main content

Week 10 - Uncut Funk - Robert

In my undergraduate work, I accidentally took a graduate philosophy class over Plato’s Theaetetus—a dialogue that examines the nature of knowing. The entire, semester-long course was dedicated to a line-by-line examination of the text to understand Plato’s theory of knowledge.


As I was reading Uncut Funk, I experienced nostalgia for that Plato course. Hall and hooks discuss the pedagogy and method of conversation early on in the dialogue, and I found profound connections between their dialogue and Plato’s philosophical dialogues. What I remember most from the course was the intellectual pleasure we got as a class in uncovering truth and understanding in our close reading. Uncut Funk deserves such an analysis, and I can envision graduate seminars of the future taking a line-by-line approach to hooks and Hall.


My question/s focus/es on the method of dialogue and public discourse as pedagogy:

1) In what public spaces (if any) do meaningful dialogues like this happen outside of Universities? Politicians and pundits would probably like to believe they have meaningful discourse, but they don’t.

2) How does technology expand or limit the possibilities of sitting down to tea and discussing the ins and outs of experience and philosophy? Has there or will there ever be a technological alternative to sitting down for a conversation that captures all of the subtleties and nuance of in-person dialogue? My gut says no.

3) What role does “good old-fashioned” dialogue have for the future of public discourse and pedagogy?

I ask these questions somewhat ironically, considering in Plato’s day, Socrates lamented the use of writing as an inferior form of human dialogue and intellectual exploration, and Plato turned around and wrote his words down; although, there is considerable debate about the faithfulness of Plato’s Socratic dialogues. The scientific and intellectual achievements of the past couple of millennia seem to debunk Socrates’s fear, but conversations have not disappeared from spaces where intellectual achievement happens. Perhaps, I am simply a curmudgeon, holding on to physical conversation as a final vestige of our digital evolution. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Corrine Contemplates the Funk

 I will keep my intro brief, as I think I will mainly just be echoing my classmates, but what a delicious book! I have really be enjoying reading two great minds converse through "the mundane to the profound" (2). Gilroy mentions in his introduction that "readers...are invited to appreciate the tone and timbre of these interlocked voices in the same spirit with which the participants listened carefully to each other" (x). I was reminded of this early in the reading, through hooks and Hall's mediations on conversation as pedagogy, especially Hall's comments on page 7: "It is as much about rhythm as anything else. If you are living the rest of your life at a certain intensified rhythm, it just doesn't fit the rhythm of conversation. You can't hurry." This seems to be compounded for academic readers by their reflections on how being "paid to talk" or teach in the academy changes the status of talking or teaching. My question then rev...
Post a Comment
Read more

26 January 2022 Reflection.

I'm stuck on certain aspects of the Butler piece, and not necessarily because of Butler's own opinions; I'm particularly drawn to their citation of Adorno's position that "nothing radical could come of common sense." I like the idea, especially the fact that anything that could truly constitute "common sense" could be interpreted as maintenance of the status quo. However, I immediately think of philosophical and political movements based on the unity of the working classes. Toward the end of World War II, then-US Vice-President Henry Agard Wallace gave a particularly compelling speech in which he declared that, in order for society to progress and reach its potential and for all humanity to achieve a lasting peace, the era after WWII needed to be the "Century of the Common Man," in which peaceful intellectual and economic competition would enable the free people of the world to create a better society. Wallace insisted that WWII was, in fac...
Post a Comment
Read more