Skip to main content

Week 7 Questions

 Adorno and Horkheimer in Industry Culture write that pseudo individuality “is the prerequisite for comprehending tragedy and removing its poison: only because individuals have ceased to be themselves and are now merely centres where the general tendencies meet, "and later they claim that the culture industry successfully deals with individuality by presenting heroes and figures that mitigate the effort to strive for individuality and instead imitate. If we examine this idea in the mass culture produced in modern society, does the argument hold up to the ideas of representation in media? Does it produce this imitation factor that tokenized representative figures to “be like” the person they see in media despite their race, ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation? What does Neoliberalism have to say about the capitalist tendencies of individuality versus the mass media culture industry? 

In Hall, “What is this Black in ‘Black Popular Culture,” Hall explains Black popular culture as “it as come to signify black community, where these traditions were kept, and whose struggles survive in the persistence of the black aesthetic, and the black counternarratives we have struggled to voice.” If we examine Stuart Hall’s ideas of pop culture as a culmination or hybrid of the diasporic experience and aesthetic, how do we qualify Black cultural production as unique and essential, and how do we refuse the binaries of Black cultural production imposed by hegemonic idealities of the high, essential arts? 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2/2 Discussion Questions

Althusser makes a point that ISAs operate as "unified" under the ruling ideology. To what extent are certain ISAs unified if they are "the site of class struggle" playing out, holding the potential for "ruptures" (to use Hall's phrase) with dominant ideologies? Here, I am thinking about the University of Iowa's COVID policies and how its rules are practiced and applied in many different ways throughout campus, as administrative burdens and scale make it difficult to oversee large numbers of employees. More generally, as junior scholars, grad students, and/or individuals doing cultural studies work, does it make more sense for us to do deep and nuanced readings of theorists such as Marx and Althusser in our work, or to cite others who have expanded these traditions over the years?

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?