Skip to main content

Week 7 Questions

 Adorno and Horkheimer in Industry Culture write that pseudo individuality “is the prerequisite for comprehending tragedy and removing its poison: only because individuals have ceased to be themselves and are now merely centres where the general tendencies meet, "and later they claim that the culture industry successfully deals with individuality by presenting heroes and figures that mitigate the effort to strive for individuality and instead imitate. If we examine this idea in the mass culture produced in modern society, does the argument hold up to the ideas of representation in media? Does it produce this imitation factor that tokenized representative figures to “be like” the person they see in media despite their race, ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation? What does Neoliberalism have to say about the capitalist tendencies of individuality versus the mass media culture industry? 

In Hall, “What is this Black in ‘Black Popular Culture,” Hall explains Black popular culture as “it as come to signify black community, where these traditions were kept, and whose struggles survive in the persistence of the black aesthetic, and the black counternarratives we have struggled to voice.” If we examine Stuart Hall’s ideas of pop culture as a culmination or hybrid of the diasporic experience and aesthetic, how do we qualify Black cultural production as unique and essential, and how do we refuse the binaries of Black cultural production imposed by hegemonic idealities of the high, essential arts? 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On Journals and Prose

My two questions from this week have emerged from the Judith Butler piece, A 'Bad Writer' Bites Back , both centered around the journal, Philosophy and Literature —which Butler describes as the self-proclaimed “arbiter of good prose.”  I agree with Butler’s staunch defense of questioning common sense and provoking “new ways of looking at a familiar world”, and was reminded of David Harvey’s quote in the introduction to his Companion to Marx’s Capital : “Real learning always entails a struggle to understand the unknown.”   Butler describes Philosophy and Literature as a “culturally conservative academic journal” which naturally led me down a longer-than-anticipated visit to the journal's website . I was greeted with a video presented by the Philosophy and Literature’s editor Garry L. Hagberg, who rails against the “jargon infested” work that litters the journal’s field, locating Philosophy and Literature in clear opposition to such bothersome clutter.  However, Hagberg...

1/26 Discussion Questions

I am interested in whether we think Giroux et al.'s call for a cultural studies that questions the cultural norms that are "so often unconsciously absorbed" (9) have been answered. In addition, I am intrigued that this piece mentions the public sphere but centers most of the discussion around "resisting intellectuals" as they operate within their classrooms. What parallels can we draw between the "New Times" of which Hall writes and the politics, forms of capitalism, subject formation, (etc.) of today? What does this say about any "deeper [cultural] tendencies" (231) that may exist? - Shannon

Addressing the Crisis: Your Collective Digital Stories

https://www.wevideo.com/view/2668669034    https://www.wevideo.com/view/2665696438  https://vimeo.com/695272441  https://www.youtube.com/embed/BN2wDbBLMWo https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pggTZblBzhQ5Nd6d8MU7jg28kBV0WixT https://www.wevideo.com/view/2648072657  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tUBup-RbbiCCl9-pWoOCvs2JFbUJYvhC/ https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Eed6_fpya8WOfEb0Hjhd4jySuMgi8fI0/