Skip to main content

Week 8 Question- Corrine

 Something I have been thinking about after these readings is the issue of abstraction. Hall, in working through Gramsci's writing, discusses how scholars have critiqued his arguments as "too concrete," too on-the-ground to be helpful for analysis outside of that particular issue (this was something I thought about as I read Gramsci's essays for this week as well- they are so historically situated, so firmly rooted in the specific instance he writes about). Hall then, in all his genius, reveals just how we can abstract Gramsci's ideas to theorize on issues like race and ethnicity, two topics that Gramsci has been critiqued for not grappling with deeply (whether he actually does this or not is, here, besides the point). 

I have a few questions that stem out of this reading of Gramsci: first, how can we both utilize Hall's abstraction of Gramsci and make sure that the scholarship we create, if not abstract in-and-of itself, can be abstracted to a "higher" level? Second, how can we abstract Hall's claims about black cultural politics and the politics of representation to discuss other notions of race and ethnicity we see occurring in contemporary society? 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Articulation_by_Abby Escatel

 In "Race, Articulation and Societies Structured in Dominance," Stuart Hall is concerned with complicating Marxist theory's tendency to overgeneralize and universalize its claims that are specifically located within a European history of labor. Questions concerning slavery, coloniality, unfree/forced labor come to the fore and force Marxist theorists to grapple with the need to be specific in their contextualization and historicization of particular moments, ruptures and conjunctures. My questions are as follows:  1. How do we move forward with Marxism while taking into account the component of "unfreedom" when conceptualizing class, labor, and labor power? How does the "proletariat" fail to account for the lived realities of racialized bodies?  2. It seems as though Hall is also saying that race is not all encompassing and also shouldn't be overgeneralized/universalized. In short, labor and race are both always already at work. As a scholar who ce...

Pedagogy vs. the indulgence of regressive politics (a. darryl moton)

I deeply hate to focus on merely one aspect of the incredibly rich texts we read for this week, but I stopped clearly on this paragraph from the Giroux: These are hard times for educators and advocates of democratic schooling. Beseiged by the growing forces of vocationalism and the neoconservative cultural warriors, prospective and existing classroom teachers are caught in an ideological crossfire regarding the civic and political responsibilities they assume as engaged critics and cultural theorists. Asked to define themselves either through the language of the marketplace or through a discourse of liberal objectivity and neutrality that abstracts the political from the realm of the cultural and sopcial, educators are increasingly being pressured to become either servants of corporate power or disengaged specialists wedded to the imperatives of a resurgent and debasing academic professionalism.(343) Having taught in high schools in the early-to-mid-2000s, I witnessed firsthand both...

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?