Skip to main content

Week 8 questions (Glenn)

As always, it was a real pleasure to read Stuart Hall's elegant, measured prose this week. 

Reading New Ethnicities, I was struck by Hall's willingness to own his mistakes—"I got the mode of address wrong too!"  (448, 449)—which underlines his desire to engage in political discourse (in this case, the 'politics of criticism') in a personable manner that often escapes more rigid, dogmatic theorists. 

My first question relates to this observation and asks: 

Have you read any other theorists who provide the same intimate self-reflectiveness that Hall offers his readers?  

a. Does humility matter in academia? If so, why? 

My second question is inspired by the final pages of Gramsci’s Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity and asks: 

How can Gramsci's writing on the contradictory nature of subordinated ideologies help us understand how, and why, racism still endures in organizations that "in the abstract, ought to be dedicated to anti-racist position" (439) such as trade unions? 

For a recent example of trade union discrimination in nearby Illinois, see here: https://chicago.suntimes.com/2020/9/7/21426285/nation-fights-systemic-racism-report-finds-pattern-exclusion-illinois-trade-unions 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On Journals and Prose

My two questions from this week have emerged from the Judith Butler piece, A 'Bad Writer' Bites Back , both centered around the journal, Philosophy and Literature —which Butler describes as the self-proclaimed “arbiter of good prose.”  I agree with Butler’s staunch defense of questioning common sense and provoking “new ways of looking at a familiar world”, and was reminded of David Harvey’s quote in the introduction to his Companion to Marx’s Capital : “Real learning always entails a struggle to understand the unknown.”   Butler describes Philosophy and Literature as a “culturally conservative academic journal” which naturally led me down a longer-than-anticipated visit to the journal's website . I was greeted with a video presented by the Philosophy and Literature’s editor Garry L. Hagberg, who rails against the “jargon infested” work that litters the journal’s field, locating Philosophy and Literature in clear opposition to such bothersome clutter.  However, Hagberg...

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?

Corrine's Op Ed

       Although the Grammy’s “rebranded” their “urban” music award in 2020 after being taken to task by Tyler, the Creator for using the term to cover all black artists, regardless of their chosen genre, its lingering presence can still be felt in the new “Progressive R&B” award that has taken its place. Where Tyler, the Creator and other artists argued for more diverse genres that allow for broader categorizations for “people who look like [him],” the Grammy’s simply tucked one category into the other, reflecting how “urban” and R&B are both intrinsically linked and coded to the Grammy’s board as “black music.” This neat folding away of urban back into R&B seems to be unhelpful at best and reductive at worst, and has serious repercussions for us all, artist or otherwise: the pigeonholing of black art/ ists into essentialized categories allows for only a few forms of blackness to be legitimated through the Grammy system, but it also reflects the rigid bo...