Skip to main content

Week 8 questions (Glenn)

As always, it was a real pleasure to read Stuart Hall's elegant, measured prose this week. 

Reading New Ethnicities, I was struck by Hall's willingness to own his mistakes—"I got the mode of address wrong too!"  (448, 449)—which underlines his desire to engage in political discourse (in this case, the 'politics of criticism') in a personable manner that often escapes more rigid, dogmatic theorists. 

My first question relates to this observation and asks: 

Have you read any other theorists who provide the same intimate self-reflectiveness that Hall offers his readers?  

a. Does humility matter in academia? If so, why? 

My second question is inspired by the final pages of Gramsci’s Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity and asks: 

How can Gramsci's writing on the contradictory nature of subordinated ideologies help us understand how, and why, racism still endures in organizations that "in the abstract, ought to be dedicated to anti-racist position" (439) such as trade unions? 

For a recent example of trade union discrimination in nearby Illinois, see here: https://chicago.suntimes.com/2020/9/7/21426285/nation-fights-systemic-racism-report-finds-pattern-exclusion-illinois-trade-unions 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2/2 Discussion Questions

Althusser makes a point that ISAs operate as "unified" under the ruling ideology. To what extent are certain ISAs unified if they are "the site of class struggle" playing out, holding the potential for "ruptures" (to use Hall's phrase) with dominant ideologies? Here, I am thinking about the University of Iowa's COVID policies and how its rules are practiced and applied in many different ways throughout campus, as administrative burdens and scale make it difficult to oversee large numbers of employees. More generally, as junior scholars, grad students, and/or individuals doing cultural studies work, does it make more sense for us to do deep and nuanced readings of theorists such as Marx and Althusser in our work, or to cite others who have expanded these traditions over the years?
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?
Post a Comment
Read more