Skip to main content

Week 8 Questions - Robert

In Hall’s discussion within “Gramsci’s Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity,” he begins by returning to the idea of the ‘open horizon.’ Specifically, he advocates for taking theory, paradigms, and interpretive schemes and applying them to new historical conditions, racism in this case. According to Hall, Gramsci practices this type of ‘open’ theory within a broader context of marxism, directing it to new questions and conditions, providing an important method for future theorists. When Hall begins his discussion of racism, he discusses the interrelationship between class and race, saying that many analyses tend to ‘privilege’ either class or race when examining this interrelationship. During this section, I was picking up some major “intersectionality” vibes. Both of my questions relate to these vibes:


“How can we see Hall’s discussion of the complexity of analyzing the interrelationship between class and race as a precursor or ‘open horizon’ for intersectionality as a transformative interpretive scheme in cultural studies?”


“How does intersectionality provide new theories, paradigms, and interpretive schemes for analyzing class, race, and ethnicity, or is it the same old framework with a shiny new package?”

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2/2 Discussion Questions

Althusser makes a point that ISAs operate as "unified" under the ruling ideology. To what extent are certain ISAs unified if they are "the site of class struggle" playing out, holding the potential for "ruptures" (to use Hall's phrase) with dominant ideologies? Here, I am thinking about the University of Iowa's COVID policies and how its rules are practiced and applied in many different ways throughout campus, as administrative burdens and scale make it difficult to oversee large numbers of employees. More generally, as junior scholars, grad students, and/or individuals doing cultural studies work, does it make more sense for us to do deep and nuanced readings of theorists such as Marx and Althusser in our work, or to cite others who have expanded these traditions over the years?
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?
Post a Comment
Read more

Articulation_by_Abby Escatel

 In "Race, Articulation and Societies Structured in Dominance," Stuart Hall is concerned with complicating Marxist theory's tendency to overgeneralize and universalize its claims that are specifically located within a European history of labor. Questions concerning slavery, coloniality, unfree/forced labor come to the fore and force Marxist theorists to grapple with the need to be specific in their contextualization and historicization of particular moments, ruptures and conjunctures. My questions are as follows:  1. How do we move forward with Marxism while taking into account the component of "unfreedom" when conceptualizing class, labor, and labor power? How does the "proletariat" fail to account for the lived realities of racialized bodies?  2. It seems as though Hall is also saying that race is not all encompassing and also shouldn't be overgeneralized/universalized. In short, labor and race are both always already at work. As a scholar who ce...
Post a Comment
Read more