Skip to main content

Week 9 Blog Post - Robert

 In “The Global, the Local, and the Return of Ethnicity,” there is a quote that reads, “Capital has never allowed its aspirations to be determined by national boundaries” (630), and I thought about this quote when reading the list of companies that have pulled out Russia in the wake of its invasion of Ukraine and global economic sanctions. I won’t pretend to know much about the ins and outs of Russia’s economic structure, nor am I intimately familiar with the complexities of the economic sanctions imposed by the rest of the world which leads me to my question:


How have Putin and Russia ignored the evolving landscape of globalization in their attempt to wage a war of maneuver in Ukraine? Or, did Russia simply miscalculate how complicated waging a war of position would be? It seems a country, forged in espionage, well-versed in creating propaganda, would be aware of the potential consequences of waging all-out war in Eastern Europe without—pardon the phrasing—proper messaging. (Ignoring the blatant racism of global outrage toward the invasion of Ukraine and near silence about the US’s invasion of Iraq) What implications does the direct involvement of Capital have for the war in Ukraine? How have Ideological State Apparatuses been deployed in regard to the war in Ukraine?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2/2 Discussion Questions

Althusser makes a point that ISAs operate as "unified" under the ruling ideology. To what extent are certain ISAs unified if they are "the site of class struggle" playing out, holding the potential for "ruptures" (to use Hall's phrase) with dominant ideologies? Here, I am thinking about the University of Iowa's COVID policies and how its rules are practiced and applied in many different ways throughout campus, as administrative burdens and scale make it difficult to oversee large numbers of employees. More generally, as junior scholars, grad students, and/or individuals doing cultural studies work, does it make more sense for us to do deep and nuanced readings of theorists such as Marx and Althusser in our work, or to cite others who have expanded these traditions over the years?
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?
Post a Comment
Read more