Skip to main content

Week 9 Question by Rajorshi

I wish I had read this week’s pieces earlier. They are so relevant to my research. 

However, I am somewhat disappointed with how Hall ends the essay on “who needs ‘identity’?” Having grappled with the relationship between subject, identity, and body (and also self?) I was expecting him to try and answer his answer. I am annoyed that he does not engage with the WOC feminist scholarship at all despite using the last few paragraphs to give token attention to feminism via Butler. Given the time that he is writing this essay, how can Hall ignore the literature produced by the likes of Moraga, Anzaldua, Lorde, Crenshaw, or Collins (even though he engages with Butler)? What does it say about his citational politics? Can identity be understood by only relying on psychoanalysis and a unidimensional understanding of phenomenology?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Corrine Contemplates the Funk

 I will keep my intro brief, as I think I will mainly just be echoing my classmates, but what a delicious book! I have really be enjoying reading two great minds converse through "the mundane to the profound" (2). Gilroy mentions in his introduction that "readers...are invited to appreciate the tone and timbre of these interlocked voices in the same spirit with which the participants listened carefully to each other" (x). I was reminded of this early in the reading, through hooks and Hall's mediations on conversation as pedagogy, especially Hall's comments on page 7: "It is as much about rhythm as anything else. If you are living the rest of your life at a certain intensified rhythm, it just doesn't fit the rhythm of conversation. You can't hurry." This seems to be compounded for academic readers by their reflections on how being "paid to talk" or teach in the academy changes the status of talking or teaching. My question then rev...
Post a Comment
Read more