Skip to main content

What is this 'Super' in the Super Bowl halftime show

Reading Stuart Hall's excellent "What is this ‘Black’ in Black Popular Culture," I couldn't help but reflect back on this year's Super Bowl halftime show—low hanging fruit, certainly, but one I have no qualms about devouring. 

This year, of course, was the first time hip-hop had taken center stage at the Super Bowl halftime show; I am deeply sad that Stuart Hall wasn't here to witness it, as his towering intellect would no doubt have enriched the often sensationalized discourse that circulated online before, during, and after the performance. 

Utilizing Hall's dynamic theoretical framework, one could compellingly argue that the halftime show signified hip-hop's incorporation into "the circuits of power of capital" (469) with the "control over narratives and representations pass[ing] into the hands of the established cultural bureaucracies" (470); in this case, allowing the NFL to censor anti-police lyrics in an attempt to sanitize the music and appease white conservative football fans. With this in mind, I ask: 

Do you agree with Dr. Cornel West's (who Hall cites throughout the article) post-show assessment that: 

[The show was] a missed opportunity for truth-telling about Brian Flores' challenge to the NFL's plantation system. Aside from brother Eminem kneeling, the political silence of our artists was sad!

My second considers Hall's concern on page 473 about "the very masculine identities that are oppressive to women, that claim visibility for their hardness only at the expense of the vulnerability of black women and the feminization of gay black men." 

Do you have concerns about the NFL's decision to "pedestal"—as documentary filmmaker Byron Hurt observed—Black musical artists such as Dr. Dre and Snoop Dogg despite their "deeply problematic lyrics about girls, women and the queer community" (Hurt) and accusations of violence against women? 

Glenn H 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Journals and Prose

My two questions from this week have emerged from the Judith Butler piece, A 'Bad Writer' Bites Back , both centered around the journal, Philosophy and Literature —which Butler describes as the self-proclaimed “arbiter of good prose.”  I agree with Butler’s staunch defense of questioning common sense and provoking “new ways of looking at a familiar world”, and was reminded of David Harvey’s quote in the introduction to his Companion to Marx’s Capital : “Real learning always entails a struggle to understand the unknown.”   Butler describes Philosophy and Literature as a “culturally conservative academic journal” which naturally led me down a longer-than-anticipated visit to the journal's website . I was greeted with a video presented by the Philosophy and Literature’s editor Garry L. Hagberg, who rails against the “jargon infested” work that litters the journal’s field, locating Philosophy and Literature in clear opposition to such bothersome clutter.  However, Hagberg...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 6 Discussion Qs

 Hall brings up the concept of interpellation as applied to social formations. (p 335) How is interpellation related to articulation? How are the two different, if at all? Must the two be discussed together? I have more difficulty conceptualizing interpellation than I do articulation. If we are to take up Hall's warning not to study racism as a set of "historically specific racisms" (336) nor as something with a "universal structure" (337). What balance can we strike today between these two approaches in our current historical moment? Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has written that certain forms of modern racism have been impacted by the prevalent ideology of "colorblindness." Are we still in this moment or are new specificities arising?
Post a Comment
Read more

Corrine's Op Ed

       Although the Grammy’s “rebranded” their “urban” music award in 2020 after being taken to task by Tyler, the Creator for using the term to cover all black artists, regardless of their chosen genre, its lingering presence can still be felt in the new “Progressive R&B” award that has taken its place. Where Tyler, the Creator and other artists argued for more diverse genres that allow for broader categorizations for “people who look like [him],” the Grammy’s simply tucked one category into the other, reflecting how “urban” and R&B are both intrinsically linked and coded to the Grammy’s board as “black music.” This neat folding away of urban back into R&B seems to be unhelpful at best and reductive at worst, and has serious repercussions for us all, artist or otherwise: the pigeonholing of black art/ ists into essentialized categories allows for only a few forms of blackness to be legitimated through the Grammy system, but it also reflects the rigid bo...
Post a Comment
Read more