Skip to main content

Last week discussion question -Shannon

 In the Mercer piece for this week, I was intrigued by the question of normative hybridization and how it relates to difference. From what I gathered, Mercer is proposing that we've reached a point where difference is no longer "subversive" in itself, and "sameness" has begun to "disrupt[] social perceptions of symbolic categories and classificatory systems." (241)


This semi-linear framework seems to perpetuate a cycle where eventually we'll get back to a place where difference is again emphasized, after "sameness" becomes the norm. If we agree with Mercer about this cycle, then what period are we in right now? Or is there any going back to "sameness" as the norm once difference has been asserted?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Corrine Contemplates the Funk

 I will keep my intro brief, as I think I will mainly just be echoing my classmates, but what a delicious book! I have really be enjoying reading two great minds converse through "the mundane to the profound" (2). Gilroy mentions in his introduction that "readers...are invited to appreciate the tone and timbre of these interlocked voices in the same spirit with which the participants listened carefully to each other" (x). I was reminded of this early in the reading, through hooks and Hall's mediations on conversation as pedagogy, especially Hall's comments on page 7: "It is as much about rhythm as anything else. If you are living the rest of your life at a certain intensified rhythm, it just doesn't fit the rhythm of conversation. You can't hurry." This seems to be compounded for academic readers by their reflections on how being "paid to talk" or teach in the academy changes the status of talking or teaching. My question then rev...
Post a Comment
Read more