This week I am reflecting on bell hooks' discussion on WOC and transnational women's solidarity. What do this solidarity and sisterhood look like in the white tower academia, where WOC are placed in competitive positions with each other and there is always a "WOC quota" in department hiring. There is also this weird expectation of WOC that you need to be critical but not so critical that makes that administration and white colleagues uncomfortable. We want your lived experience for diversity but not for change. This often creates tensions within WOC groups, some want to climb the white tower ladder, while some are struggling to compromise. I am thinking about Peter Liang's piece and the fell out with #blackintheivory on Twitter.
In "Race, Articulation and Societies Structured in Dominance," Stuart Hall is concerned with complicating Marxist theory's tendency to overgeneralize and universalize its claims that are specifically located within a European history of labor. Questions concerning slavery, coloniality, unfree/forced labor come to the fore and force Marxist theorists to grapple with the need to be specific in their contextualization and historicization of particular moments, ruptures and conjunctures. My questions are as follows: 1. How do we move forward with Marxism while taking into account the component of "unfreedom" when conceptualizing class, labor, and labor power? How does the "proletariat" fail to account for the lived realities of racialized bodies? 2. It seems as though Hall is also saying that race is not all encompassing and also shouldn't be overgeneralized/universalized. In short, labor and race are both always already at work. As a scholar who ce...
Comments
Post a Comment