Skip to main content

World Tree - OP-Ed - Robert

    Imagine a tree growing forty varieties of fruit. Standing in one place, you reach up and grab a peach, cherry, plum, or nectarine. Does it sound like fantasy or science fiction? Well, it’s neither. Visitors to Syracuse University don’t have to imagine the Tree of 40 Fruit growing on campus. Sam Van Aken, a sculptor, “invented” the tree by combining science and art, grafting many fruit buds onto one central tree.

    This tree illustrates my understanding of globalization: connecting diverse knowledge and cultures across national borders. Contact with distant parts of the world gives us access to food, technology, art, and many other things we would not have otherwise. While this simplified definition does not encompass globalization entirely, basic knowledge builds a foundation for understanding our world.

    We all experience tension between local and global cultures. It’s rooted in our media, politics, and markets. Whether individuals embrace or resist globalization is irrelevant. As Stewart Hall observes, “Capital has never allowed its aspirations to be determined by national boundaries” (Hall 630). So long as capitalism creates markets that cross borders, global connections will continue to multiply. Without meaningful intervention from people and governments, unregulated markets, unfortunately, exploit people. Given these trends, we must dedicate our energy to growing a stronger future.

    The Tree inhabits a valuable space, symbolizing local and global connections. Any branch, its own local community of like-minded fruit. Neighbors largely resemble one another in appearance and taste. On an adjacent branch, there may be fruit similar in appearance and taste yet may differ in some ways. Fruit on the opposite side of the tree has no immediate knowledge of distant neighbors, yet all fruits rely on the same life. These fruits—different in their appearance, location, and taste—receive life-sustaining nutrients from the same roots and contribute to the beauty of the tree.

    Humans live in local pods where we often resemble one another. We brush against neighbors and interact directly within local communities. People in distant corners of the globe can be mysterious for any number of reasons: language, culture, appearance, religion, politics, etc. Yet, “In a world saturated by money…the ‘market’ is the most…universal experience…for everyone.” (Hall 37). Life-sustaining markets should support all lives equally.

    Nations are more connected than ever before. While some people embrace the benefits—international travel, study abroad programs, and culinary diversity—others fear changes to their local identities, wishing to return to a simpler past when people looked out for themselves.

    Did this simple life ever truly exist? Yes and no. “Most modern nations consist of disparate cultures which were only unified by a lengthy process of violent conquest…” (Hall 629). Most local identities are hybrids.

    Returning to the tree, nothing truly advanced went into its creation. Van Aken simply used common grafting techniques. Western cultures, the U.S. especially, like to think humans are above nature, yet everything we do, everything we create is natural in its own way, including the Tree of 40 Fruit and globalization.

    Are the intricacies of this system perfect? No. Far from it. Some feel anxious about globalization for valid reasons. There are inequities and power imbalances caused by exploitation: child labor in unregulated markets or building tremendous sports complexes to be abandoned after the Olympic’s closing ceremony. But, hybrid identities are nothing to fear. Instead, we can choose to right wrongs and cultivate justice.

    We cannot escape the system because we are the system (Adorno and Horkheimer 408). We constantly live globalization, pruning flaws, all while reaching toward beauty and fairness. To be clear, this is not a case for turning the world into America, but a call to share the collective wisdom of all cultures. School children make friends with global neighbors. Communities contribute intellectuals to universities, funding medical and sustainability research to benefit all. When we see a neighbor instead of a stranger, we practice revolutionary love (Kaur). Different fruit, growing on the same tree. We can all strive toward a better future. Globalization provides a means; we must supply the will. Because who doesn’t want tasty fruit?


References


Adorno, Theodor, and Max Horkheimer. “The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception.” The Cultural Studies Reader, edited by Simon During, Routledge, New York, NY, 1993, pp. 405-415.

Hall, Stuart. “The Global, the Local, and the Return to Ethnicity.” Social Theory: The Multicultural and Classic Readings, edited by Charles Lemert, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1996, pp. 626-633.

Hall, Stuart, et al. “The Problem of Ideology: Marxism without Guarantees.” Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies, Routledge, London, 2005, pp. 24-46.

Kaur, Valarie. See No Stranger: A Memoir and Manifesto of Revolutionary Love. Penguin Random House, 2020.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On Journals and Prose

My two questions from this week have emerged from the Judith Butler piece, A 'Bad Writer' Bites Back , both centered around the journal, Philosophy and Literature —which Butler describes as the self-proclaimed “arbiter of good prose.”  I agree with Butler’s staunch defense of questioning common sense and provoking “new ways of looking at a familiar world”, and was reminded of David Harvey’s quote in the introduction to his Companion to Marx’s Capital : “Real learning always entails a struggle to understand the unknown.”   Butler describes Philosophy and Literature as a “culturally conservative academic journal” which naturally led me down a longer-than-anticipated visit to the journal's website . I was greeted with a video presented by the Philosophy and Literature’s editor Garry L. Hagberg, who rails against the “jargon infested” work that litters the journal’s field, locating Philosophy and Literature in clear opposition to such bothersome clutter.  However, Hagberg...

Articulation_by_Abby Escatel

 In "Race, Articulation and Societies Structured in Dominance," Stuart Hall is concerned with complicating Marxist theory's tendency to overgeneralize and universalize its claims that are specifically located within a European history of labor. Questions concerning slavery, coloniality, unfree/forced labor come to the fore and force Marxist theorists to grapple with the need to be specific in their contextualization and historicization of particular moments, ruptures and conjunctures. My questions are as follows:  1. How do we move forward with Marxism while taking into account the component of "unfreedom" when conceptualizing class, labor, and labor power? How does the "proletariat" fail to account for the lived realities of racialized bodies?  2. It seems as though Hall is also saying that race is not all encompassing and also shouldn't be overgeneralized/universalized. In short, labor and race are both always already at work. As a scholar who ce...

Week 5

  What are the differences between Gramsci’s concept of the “organic intellectual” and Hall’s “public pedagogy?”   On the topic of the diasporic intellectual, Kuan-Hsing Chen mentions that “Some of the diasporic intellectuals I know of have exercised their power, for better or worse, back home, but you have not. And some of them are trying to move back, in whatever way. So, in that sense, you are very peculiar” (503). Although Hall felt some reconnection with the Carribean through the Black diasporic population in Britain, he insists that cultural identity is not fixed but “comes out of very specific historical formations, out of very specific histories and cultural repertoires of enunciation, that it can constitute a ‘positionality’, which we call, provisionally, identity” (503). Individuals can negotiate, rearticulate, recontextualize their different identities, but how does this rearticulation work at an institutional-level?   Thelma